Earlier quoted context omitted.
My friend's family lives in Bosnia. He lives in the United States. He supports his family with his income, and frequently sends money from the United States to Bosnia. Best case scenario, using Paypal (Xoom), a centralized company, this takes him two days. Two days is the best case scenario! With Bitcoin it is almost instant. They switched to cryptocurrency after a near disastrous situation with the length of time th…
His best case scenario is opening a Wise multi-currency account, with supporting instant transfers free of charge in many cases. Bitcoin is not accepted anywhere, practically speaking. As such you're only looking at a small fraction of the transaction. You actually need to (1) transfer money into a crypto exchange for a 1-2% fee and whatever delay the domestic transfer takes (2) purchase Bitcoin for whatever fee the…
Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
581–590 of 697 posts
Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#582Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#583Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please show me a real world use case that's better than the status quo and is not speculation or gambling. It's been over 12 years and I'm still looking. Cryptoclowns can't use the it's too early excuse anymore. But they choose to listen to a handful of man children running around promising world peace via a distributed database.
Easy: bypassing financial censorship. Hint: try buying a 4chan pass without cryptocurrency.
Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#584Earlier quoted context omitted.
>All the V3 crypto protocols have exactly as you describe above. However, instead of the money going into the coffers of the company, it goes into a 'Development fund' That will award the crypto to people who have applied and been voted on by the community to launch a project/technology in the protocol. So you replaced "shareholders" with "developers of cryptocurrencies/beneficiaries of the development fund". Does a…
> made it as energy inefficient as humanly possible in the case of PoW I'd encourage you to broaden your understanding of the purpose of PoW and specifically the energy used. The energy used is the cost of securing a PoW blockchain--quite literally, the cost of the energy used is what makes it difficult to mount a successful attack. It is simple and universally accessible. It is not "inefficient"; it is functioning e…
Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#585This is good. The backing of stablecoins is a very real issue. As the Treasury points out, there's a very real possibility of a run. Two stablecoins have crashed so far, SafeDollar SDO, and $TITAN. They went all the way to zero. Can Tether survive a net outflow? Probably not. They don't have the collateral. Dai is really a derivative of Etherium. Dai is backed by Etherium at 150%. So value in Dai is at risk if the pr…
Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#586This is good. The backing of stablecoins is a very real issue. As the Treasury points out, there's a very real possibility of a run. Two stablecoins have crashed so far, SafeDollar SDO, and $TITAN. They went all the way to zero. Can Tether survive a net outflow? Probably not. They don't have the collateral. Dai is really a derivative of Etherium. Dai is backed by Etherium at 150%. So value in Dai is at risk if the pr…
> Can Tether survive a net outflow? Probably not. They don't have the collateral. Luckily for Paolo & friends, their terms of service clearly state that they do not ever have to offer redemptions of USDT for dollars. Or even whatever IOUs and bits of string they may or may not have in reserve. Out of all the stable coins its the most likely to withstand a "run" because they do not have to pay you if you ask. In fact…
Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#587Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But Tether's been around more than seven years, more than enough time for the "smart money" to profit by obliterating them. > The fact that Tether maintains its 1:1 peg to the dollar is a signal that maybe all the smart guys who have been confidently predicting its imminent and inevitable failure for the last seven years might be missing something. Bernie Madoff claimed that his scam started in 1991, though in real…
There wasn't this loud of a chorus continuously yelling that Madoff and Gox were scams, in every possible media outlet from blogs to Bloomberg, for seven years. There wasn't a well publicized US federal indictment and investigation of Madoff and Gox, settled with a fine and no injunction. I'm not saying Tether is clean or 100% funded, I don't know. But unlike Madoff and Gox, accusations have been very loud and very p…
Check this guy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Markopolos
Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#588Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not quite correct, although I understand your sentiment. When you own a share of Square (or Visa, or PayPal) each time a transaction takes place on their network, a portion of that transaction (revenue minus costs) accrues to the company - and by extension increases the intrinsic value of your share. The transaction revenue is spent on furniture, on R&D, on employees and on buffing up their cash position. As a…
On Ethereum, the majority of transaction fees are burned. In effect, they are distributed to ETH holders in the same way that stock buybacks distribute corporate revenues.
Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#589Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not quite correct, although I understand your sentiment. When you own a share of Square (or Visa, or PayPal) each time a transaction takes place on their network, a portion of that transaction (revenue minus costs) accrues to the company - and by extension increases the intrinsic value of your share. The transaction revenue is spent on furniture, on R&D, on employees and on buffing up their cash position. As a…
Also, not quite correct. Bitcoin isn't figuratively a store of value, it actually is. The amount of bitcoin on DeFi, backing collateral for flash loans and Stablecoin minting is astounding. >When you own a share of Square (or Visa, or PayPal) each time a transaction takes place on their network, a portion of that transaction (revenue minus costs) accrues to the company - and by extension increases the intrinsic value…
If I borrow a Bitcoin what makes you think that I can repay the Bitcoin after it grew 10x in value? Who is doing 10x the work? (10x more productive)
Re: Report on Stablecoins [pdf]
#590Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Bitcoin isn't figuratively a store of value, it actually is. It's a speculative, negative-sum MLM token. I suggest reading up on what a store of value is. [1] I'm not saying there aren't ways of monetizing it within the network - which may indeed create value, but intrinsically, it is a negative-sum asset, a mechanism of redistributing real cold hard dollars from new participants to old entrants and miners. It crea…
It seems our difference in opinion comes from our definition of value. I know people point to the current system and infrastructure of stock exchanges, SWIFT, the IMF, Central Banks, Retail and Commercial Banks, Internet Banks (Such as Stripe, Paypal, ETC.), Credit Unions, Savings and Loan Associations, Investment Banks and Companies, Brokerage Firms, Insurance Companies as working good enough. But for me... Occams r…