It takes two things for programs like "Jedi Blue" to happen. First, you need sociopaths in leadership positions who champion this 'great idea' they've figured out. These people often rise up in large companies because they are willing to do this sort of thing without any remorse. But second, you need developers to build it. A large number of them, usually, for a big project like this. Dozens of people like us knew th…
Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
141–150 of 428 posts
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#142The big tech companies (and more) act as a cartel, doing things for each other to kick out smaller rivals or just censor and deplatform people and groups they don't like. This is just evidence that it's more than wink-and-nod deals, which I think most of us suspected anyway. Social media, search, payment processors, hosting sites... they all work in lockstep for the benefit of the cartel. We lose privacy, opportunity…
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't try to use political division to redirect people's anger at each other. I'm to the point where I'm deeply suspicious of the motives of anyone who deploys a novel way to recast an issue as partisan. I hope others are equally suspicious.
No, I just want to make sure what am I looking at.
You don't need to believe anything. You can learn to reason about things with uncertainty. There's even logics to help with it.
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe Google’s researchers are kept out of the loop.
Well I imagine so. But it still means google management decided to fund (relatively expensive) top notch research just to act as a front for their criminal operation.
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
Frankly, I'm not sure about the current state of things, seeing as it likely has changed several times in the past few years. However, a) I'm not sure why Goog would want to bother with browser accounts otherwise, and b) my use of Chrome ceased soonish after I had the following experience in the early 2010s: - set up a new empty site, listed absolutely nowhere, on quite dedicated hosting. - open it in Chrome. - a cou…
This could also be via dns records if you published some they would get scanned
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#146Does anyone else wonder if Page and Brin feel any pangs of guilt over how their company went from "Don't be evil" to such corrupt practises? It really is a classic case study in the journey from apparent idealism to a complete moral vacuum.
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#147What can we as people in top 1% with 1) information about big tech abuses 2) skills to fix this do? Individually we can use browsers like firefox or brave and probably donate time or money to them, but I think it's not enough. I think we would need something like a movement against those abuses, but probably the biggest win would be a business model that could win with them in the free market. Is this possible? Has a…
I tell everyone about Firefox and uBlock Origin. Blocking YouTube ads is enough of an argument to convince anyone to at least try it out. I've never seen someone who didn't love the ad-free web experience. It's actually safe to just install this software on random computers: people's quality of life will be invisibly yet thoroughly improved, they will notice that things are just better even if they can't explain why.…
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#148Hello advertisers. You are being manipulated and abused just like the consumers you are targeting. There is very little evidence to show that invasive digital advertising is actually effective. When was the last time you clicked on one of these ads and actually made a purchase? Bad for consumers and bad for advertisers. Why continue with this opaque, profit sucking charade that mainly enriches those selling the ads?
This kind of rhetoric is problematically naive. Advertising effectiveness is often vague, but it also works well in many circumstances. It takes a certain kind of hubris to suggest that all these companies spending $500B on advertising have no idea what they are doing, and that if only they listened to HN/Reddit they could save so much money and make the world a better place. The issue here is to what extent G has ma…
And yet they don't.
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#149I sometimes wonder, what if there was a universal governing principle, that was simple to enforce, obvious, formulated in few words, so that everyone understands it. All those priveleges which every of theese corporations enjoy, some simple, like not publishing schematic for 1000$+ device, some complex, like making backroom deals harming millions of people in a some insignificant and obscure way daily, like showing c…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benefit_corporation
Unfortunately, just like with non-profits, these designations just end up being gamed.
You can't rule out evil because evil thwarts rules. Sometimes evil even makes rules to rule out good. It's a nice thought though.
Re: Google has a secret deal with FB called “Jedi Blue” that they knew was illegal
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't chrome have browsing history sync?
Uh uh! While I'm obviously no fan of Google and Chrome, afaik the synced data is encrypted, or at least Goog says so. I.e. it's used just for syncing. Can't remember, though, if it's always encrypted, or just optionally encrypted.