I hope those limitations didn't serve a vital safety purpose.
Nope. Unless you consider having to look at shipping containers to be a vital safety issue. From the City of Long Beach's announcement [1]:
> These provisions, which have been in effect for many years, were established to address the visual impact to surrounding areas of sites with excessive storage.
Why wasn't the federal government doing this? How hard would it have been for the new "shipping czar" to have gone down there and seen what at least one simple issue was and get it fixed?
Because US ports are run by private companies and not the federal government. The "Port of Long Beach" run by the local port authority is primarily a landlord. It's called capitalism.
> Yet somehow nearly no one in America is aware of this or concerned about it. I wish I understood why that is. Because people love zoning! NIMBY is the rallying cry at zoning board hearings, where whiny people who only care about themselves make sure those Chinese people don't put their stinky laundromats near our nice rich white neighborhood. It's the main reason zoning exists! Particularly the wealthy people who h…
> NIMBY is the rallying cry at zoning board hearings, where whiny people who only care about themselves make sure those Chinese people don't put their stinky laundromats near our nice rich white neighborhood. Yes some of prefer zoning to "mixed" and "diverse" neighborhoods. What's wrong with me not willing to see a laundromat or an office building next to my house? Or what's wrong with me willing to live in quiet fam…
Nothings wrong with that. Nothing is stopping you from buying up the land around you, or agreeing with you neighbors to make a HOA that has those characteristics.
The problem with zoning, is that it isn't voluntary.
Why wasn't the federal government doing this? How hard would it have been for the new "shipping czar" to have gone down there and seen what at least one simple issue was and get it fixed?
People are waking up and realizing that government is pretty useless for specific action. Our representatives would rather pontificate about vague niceties.
I mean, you have to have law and order. That means laws. Someone has to be able to take specific action regarding those laws, and that means a government. We just have to expect competency and responsiveness from the government. There’s no alternative (get rid of the government and a power vacuum would develop and then be filled within seconds and you’d have a new “government” with a warlord or whatever).
This story actually had a good ending so far as the government actually responded about a day after the Flexport CEO’s Twitter thread. Sure, we wish the problem was solved earlier, but this is a good thing and should be celebrated!
You can’t flat out say the rise in retail sales is due to stimulus. There are a lot of disruptions over the last year that have shifted spend from things like dining out and travel.
This chart tells you most of what you need to know. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RPI This shows the insane increase in personal income over the course of the pandemic. Many made more money on enhanced UI benefits than in their line of work. This is a known fact. People in this situation have more propensity to spend the marginal dollar than higher income earners. Spending as a percentage of income inversely tre…
How much upshifting in jobs has occurred?
Before the pandemic we talked about unfilled jobs looking for computer programmers and other higher paid positions. How many people moved from 'social' jobs to ones that required more skills but pay more?
Maybe companies shouldn't be allowed to spew toxic carcinogens into the atmosphere so that wouldn't matter?
how about a landfill. ever been to one? they smell quite awful. nothing illegal about them, and they would pretty much ruin a junior high school right next door.
And they're a horrible mistake of history that was a bad idea. The planet is a closed loop system with limited resources. Our use of those limited resources should be closed loop as well.
Just no. Zoning is extremely important. You should not be allowed to build a factory in the middle of a neighborhood next to a school. There are certainly bad zoning laws but to say they are all bad is just ignorant nonsense.
Why not? It sounds like you think this is obvious, but it isn’t to me. I live in an area with occasional grandfathered-in exceptions to zoning rules. There’s a cafe run out of a house, and a butcher shop run on a residential street corner between houses. And its absolutely lovely! I would have no problem with people making things (“a factory”) next to a school.
That must be so, since you said it. Do you acknowledge, though, that many people would not like a factory next to their house? How about a foundry? How about an airport? And do you think that people's preferences ought to be taken into account by their local government? If so, there's no argument here, you just have your own opinion.
People are waking up and realizing that government is pretty useless for specific action. Our representatives would rather pontificate about vague niceties.
>People are waking up and realizing that government is pretty useless for specific action. Well, sure. The higher up you go, the less tactical (and more strategic) you become. You wouldn't want your CTO to launch code to production. You want her to make sure there is a plan to utilize CICD practices- that the ICs implement.
I mean, good leaders actually DO dig into the tactical details if a massive bottleneck occurs. Because they’re often the only ones with the authority to solve it.
Truckers are leaving containers all over Los Angeles.[1] Allowing stacking over 2 high is only useful if you have the equipment to stack over 2 high. A place that just stacks empty containers 2 high probably only has large forklifts. The special equipment for high stacking is far more expensive, and only bought if you need it.[2] A more useful proposal is a "peel pile".[3] This is a system which assigns outgoing truc…
> Truckers are leaving containers all over Los Angeles.[1]
There are so many of them, that they couldn't find a picture of one of them to illustrate the article