You can construct an argument that we never landed on the moon if you cherry pick your data carefully.
That’s the point being made here: not that his examples are wrong, that they are cherry picked to support his views.
It may be superficially thought provoking, but it is not compelling as a logical argument.
There are tangible downsides to ignoring expert advice; you are not a god. You cannot be an expert at everything.
It is not possible to be an expert at everything.
Therefore, yes, asking questions to understand a topic is good, but no, ignoring the advice of an expert is not good.
The examples given only show examples where the result of ignoring the expert, or third party advice was positive; it can’t possibly be true that this can be the case in all circumstances, except by sheer good luck.
I whole heartedly agree that asking questions is more important than looking smart… but:
> Overall, I view the upsides of being willing to look stupid as much larger than the downsides. When it comes to things that aren't socially judged, like winning a game, understanding something, or being able to build things due to having a good understanding, it's all upside.
You don’t have to look stupid to be able to do all those things, you just have to be humble and work hard.