Live data from Hacker News

NixOS on Framework Laptop

kvark.github.io

201–210 of 250 posts

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To me, Macbooks have the worst trackpad 'feel' so hopefully it's nothing like that.

Wow! That's actually the first time I've ever heard this opinion

Yeah, not a lot of marketing money behind not liking Apple things, or anyone's things, for that matter.

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you do NixOS without systemd? If not, I'd look elsewhere for the distro. Maybe Guix?

Just take the time to learn systemd. Once you do, like nix, it saves so much time

Responding to "I don't like this" with "just learn it" is effectively saying "anyone who disagrees with me that this thing is awesome only does so because they know less than me." I'm very familiar with systemd, and I make use of its features on systems I can't avoid it on, but I still hate it.

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#203
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I suppose one can certainly adapt to mostly any sort of input device given enough time, but that does not mean that they're done well. Most people that have used trackpads in windows/linux land prior to the last 8 years or so could easily tell you how horrendous they were (and some still are). A lot of this comes down to software, of course. Microsoft's precision touchpad drivers were a game changer for Windows devic…

You're speaking for an awful lot of people. Maybe HN skews towards Apple fans and therefore might just possibly have a few extra upvotes for Apples defaults?

There's not been a study on it as far as I know (maybe there's some polls online, though?), if that's what you're hoping for. Obviously it's going to be largely anecdotal but it's not exactly just Apple bias. It's notable because the remarks about the trackpad often come from non-mac users who painfully concede that the trackpad experience on MacOS is better. One example I can think of is Linus from Linus Tech Tips always using a mac trackpad as the gold standard to compare against in his laptop reviews.

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#204
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

systemd is so complex, I've come to a conclusion, that it no longer fits my definition of free software. We allow runaway complexity to obscure the inner workings of an important software package, to the point, where having source access no longer makes a practical difference to a "casual" power-user or even a software engineer. I can source-dive runit, s6, OpenBSD's rc, or OpenRC and within a weekend, have a pretty…

That's an interesting line to draw! Do you think this also extends to stuff like firefox or java vm, or are you only focusing on "system" software with that analysis?

The key is how necessary the complexity is. The existence of simpler alternatives to systemd (that work just as well to run a system with) prove that its complexity is unnecessary. For things like Web browsers, the complexity is necessary, for better or worse.

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow! That's actually the first time I've ever heard this opinion

Yeah, not a lot of marketing money behind not liking Apple things, or anyone's things, for that matter.

Just accept that others have a different opinion to you. No need to come up with some conspiracy about why we're not a homogenous blob.

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#206
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you do NixOS without systemd? If not, I'd look elsewhere for the distro. Maybe Guix?

What would you prefer to have in Nix instead of systemd?

Literally any other init system. Maybe OpenRC, runit, or upstart? I'd even prefer to be stuck with sysvinit forever instead.

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#207
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're speaking for an awful lot of people. Maybe HN skews towards Apple fans and therefore might just possibly have a few extra upvotes for Apples defaults?

There's not been a study on it as far as I know (maybe there's some polls online, though?), if that's what you're hoping for. Obviously it's going to be largely anecdotal but it's not exactly just Apple bias. It's notable because the remarks about the trackpad often come from non-mac users who painfully concede that the trackpad experience on MacOS is better. One example I can think of is Linus from Linus Tech Tips a…

There's also this dude who has spent 2 years trying to get a mac touchpad experience on linux

https://bill.harding.blog/2020/04/26/linux-touchpad-like-a-m...

https://bill.harding.blog/2019/03/25/linux-touchpad-like-a-m...

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, not a lot of marketing money behind not liking Apple things, or anyone's things, for that matter.

Just accept that others have a different opinion to you. No need to come up with some conspiracy about why we're not a homogenous blob.

I believe my point is precisely that we aren't homogeneous and that perhaps your perspective isn't quite as ubiquitous as you think.

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#209
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're speaking for an awful lot of people. Maybe HN skews towards Apple fans and therefore might just possibly have a few extra upvotes for Apples defaults?

There's not been a study on it as far as I know (maybe there's some polls online, though?), if that's what you're hoping for. Obviously it's going to be largely anecdotal but it's not exactly just Apple bias. It's notable because the remarks about the trackpad often come from non-mac users who painfully concede that the trackpad experience on MacOS is better. One example I can think of is Linus from Linus Tech Tips a…

Yes, its anecdotal. That's my point.

Re: NixOS on Framework Laptop

#210
post #7
post #4

> Mozilla requires LUKS full-disk encryption, and having it setup conflicted with NVidia’s proprietary driver I’ve seen this warning in the Ubuntu docs. Can someone explain exactly why a GPU driver would cause issues with disk encryption and UEFI boot?

I conjecture the securely booted kernel won't load unsigned modules, and out-of-tree drivers don't get signed when the kernel and its modules do.

I wish people understood the Secure Boot spec better. This problem is totally unnecessary. The spec says no unsigned code can run until ExitBootServices is called, but people treat it as if it said that no unsigned kernel code can ever run.
Post reply on HN