The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
31–40 of 91 posts
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#32The discovery of the treatment in the methylene blue dye is quite fascinating. How exactly did someone figure that out for such a rare condition? And imagine being deep blue all your life and everyone knowing you as blue, then you take this blue pill and bam, you're pink as can be. Must have seemed like practical magic.
> And imagine being deep blue all your life and everyone knowing you as blue, then you take this blue pill and bam, you're pink as can be. Must have seemed like practical magic. Almost sounds like homeopathy, without the dilution, that actually works.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And imagine being deep blue all your life and everyone knowing you as blue, then you take this blue pill and bam, you're pink as can be. Must have seemed like practical magic. Almost sounds like homeopathy, without the dilution, that actually works.
So, not homeopathy?
Using a blue substance to cure someone who's blue is similar to the first gimmick, but here they actually use the substance and medically tested it.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#34>Though today Benjy and most of the Fugate family descendants have lost their blue coloring, the tint still comes out in their skin when they are cold or flush with anger. I wish they had included at least one photograph of this.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#35Not to be insensitive, but it would have been interesting if they had a member of the family play an Andorian in Star Trek. Think about it.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#36In animals/plants this is why inbreeding can serve a useful function. If you want to detect a recessive gene, but either don't have access to genetic testing or are not sure which gene is involved, you in-breed until you see individuals who express the recessive gene. These individuals inherited the recessive gene from both parents. You then know which parental lines carry the gene, which lets you select for or against it.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, not homeopathy?
I get their point, homeopathy has two bs gimmicks. The first is to use a substance that causes the ailment as a cure, the second is to replace that substance with water/sugar and the idea of the substance. Using a blue substance to cure someone who's blue is similar to the first gimmick, but here they actually use the substance and medically tested it.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#38The discovery of the treatment in the methylene blue dye is quite fascinating. How exactly did someone figure that out for such a rare condition? And imagine being deep blue all your life and everyone knowing you as blue, then you take this blue pill and bam, you're pink as can be. Must have seemed like practical magic.
> And imagine being deep blue all your life and everyone knowing you as blue, then you take this blue pill and bam, you're pink as can be. Must have seemed like practical magic. Almost sounds like homeopathy, without the dilution, that actually works.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's some photos of Paul Karason on Google Images, who developed the same condition from silver poisoning.
He turned blue from silver poisoning, he did not develop methemoglobinemia from it.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, not homeopathy?
I get their point, homeopathy has two bs gimmicks. The first is to use a substance that causes the ailment as a cure, the second is to replace that substance with water/sugar and the idea of the substance. Using a blue substance to cure someone who's blue is similar to the first gimmick, but here they actually use the substance and medically tested it.
Then use a substance that causes the same symptom (usually not the ailment, only one of the symptoms), and then dilute it away.
So it scores 2 out of 3. But the dilution part is important :)