Earlier quoted context omitted.
That tree's focused on only one person, Ben Stacy; his ancestors. The entire tree sounds a lot more connected: > However, by the early 1960s, some members of the Fugate clan had begun to resent their cobalt-tinted skin. Not only did their skin mark them as different, but by that time, people had already begun to associate their skin color with the family’s history of inbreeding .
I think if any of us had a visual cue showing our familial ties people would also say we had a family history of inbreeding.
The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
21–30 of 91 posts
It’s called pedigree collapse. Your family tree grows exponentially to the second power with each generation. So a mere 50 generations ago, which is to say roughly 1000-1500 years ago, you had 1,125,899,906,842,624 slots in your family tree. Needless to say the vast majority of those slots don't have a unique person in them.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#22Anyone have better photos, maybe from the 70s onward?
There's some photos of Paul Karason on Google Images, who developed the same condition from silver poisoning.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#23Maybe the old term for European aristocrat, blue blood, along with its inbreeding connotations, is more literal than history gives it credence. It's usually attributed to pale skin but perhaps methemoglobinemia was on display.
https://www.historyextra.com/period/georgian/why-people-nobl...
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#24Now I wonder if the blue skined gods of hinduism are based on real people
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#25>Though today Benjy and most of the Fugate family descendants have lost their blue coloring, the tint still comes out in their skin when they are cold or flush with anger. I wish they had included at least one photograph of this.
They do, toward the end of the article.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#26>Though today Benjy and most of the Fugate family descendants have lost their blue coloring, the tint still comes out in their skin when they are cold or flush with anger. I wish they had included at least one photograph of this.
They do, toward the end of the article.
He does not look blue.
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#27Therefore, close relatives to marry is a human breeding taboo, will greatly increase the probability of genetic diseases in infants
Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#28Re: The Fugate family of Kentucky has had blue skin for centuries (2017)
#29Blue fugate(s) would be a cool name for a band