Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I mean an alternative that is what Firefox purports to be? To privacy and functionality thow shalt count. Not to infunctionality, nor tracking. Google is Right Out.
Google respects your privacy and Chrome tends to have more features than Firefox.
Do you work there? I see no other way you could possibly think this.
If not, do you have a source you can provide?
> Chrome tends to have more features than Firefox
This is true. Some features, I have no use for, some are outside of standards and thus lead to the same issue as years ago with IE, and some fall under both.
Admittedly, me having no use for some doesn't mean they don't have value for other people. It's the standard extend and extinguishing that worries me.
And yes, a standard that only one company can hit may as well be extinguished.