Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 93

mozilla.org

91–100 of 235 posts

Re: Firefox 93

#91
Here's what I desperately want from Firefox, which I currently have from Chrome: isolated browser profiles tied to an account. I have two browser windows open at all times, one for my personal stuff and one for my work stuff. I want to keep those two windows totally isolated, where I log in with all my work accounts in one window, and all my personal accounts in the other window. Chrome does this by tying the window to a Gmail account, I'd happily sign up for two Firefox accounts if I could do this.

Re: Firefox 93

#92
post #71

I hope we can turn off the "unsafe download" thing. I download files every day that I know are perfectly safe, precisely because the file will only ever be downloaded once, by me, because I just built it in Gitlab.

Isn't it still unsafe, because someone can intercept the downloaded file in transit?

Re: Firefox 93

#93
post #68
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? So every time you bring in a dependency on a library written by someone else, your software is just a theme or wrapper? I guess that's one way to look at it.

If you're making a browser and your dependency is a browser...yes.

[deleted]

Re: Firefox 93

#94
post #91

Here's what I desperately want from Firefox, which I currently have from Chrome: isolated browser profiles tied to an account. I have two browser windows open at all times, one for my personal stuff and one for my work stuff. I want to keep those two windows totally isolated, where I log in with all my work accounts in one window, and all my personal accounts in the other window. Chrome does this by tying the window…

Firefox has this, it's called multi account containers. It's an add-on published by Mozilla.

Re: Firefox 93

#95
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mozilla is foolish to buy into Google's bad faith attempt to create barriers to entry for small/old sites and further centralize the web.

Yeah how dare Mozilla force sites to pay for TLS certificates! It’s a racket I tell you! If they’re going to be required in order to be on the internet they should be free Mozilla: Okay, done.

You should see what godaddy charges to manage SSL for a WP site!

Re: Firefox 93

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can put export MOZ_USE_XINPUT2=1 into your ~/.bash_profile or ~/.bashrc (edit: or just ~/.profile under ubuntu). You'll have to logout/login to "apply" that. Alternatively you can edit the .desktop file of Firefox, but that might not catch all the ways in which firefox may be launched.

Hmm.. I tried to execute "export MOZ_USE_XINPUT2=1" in the terminal and then start FF from the GUI and it did not have an impact. So I guess it would also not work in .bashrc. But not sure.

No that's not how that works. Environment variables are inherited from parent processes. If you just put that in a sibling process (like a terminal), it won't run firefox with that variable if you run it from the GUI.

Your .bash_profile allows you to set up the environment for your entire session.

Re: Firefox 93

#97
post #91

Here's what I desperately want from Firefox, which I currently have from Chrome: isolated browser profiles tied to an account. I have two browser windows open at all times, one for my personal stuff and one for my work stuff. I want to keep those two windows totally isolated, where I log in with all my work accounts in one window, and all my personal accounts in the other window. Chrome does this by tying the window…

You can use profiles with Firefox https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-...

You can also use containers on Firefox for isolating specific sites

Re: Firefox 93

#98
post #91

Here's what I desperately want from Firefox, which I currently have from Chrome: isolated browser profiles tied to an account. I have two browser windows open at all times, one for my personal stuff and one for my work stuff. I want to keep those two windows totally isolated, where I log in with all my work accounts in one window, and all my personal accounts in the other window. Chrome does this by tying the window…

>isolated browser profiles

Firefox can do that. Just run firefox -p.

>tied to an account

Is that really necessary?

Re: Firefox 93

#99
post #71

I hope we can turn off the "unsafe download" thing. I download files every day that I know are perfectly safe, precisely because the file will only ever be downloaded once, by me, because I just built it in Gitlab.

If you click through the learn more link, you can see an example of the new warning. Instead of starting the download, it shows a dialog with a warning and there are two buttons, one of which is "Allow download".

The second part of this feature is that for elements, regardless of HTTP/S origin, Firefox will no longer allow the iframe to initiate downloads unless the sandbox attribute explicitly includes allow-downloads

It appears that there are a pair of preferences in about:config to govern these: dom.block_download_insecure and dom.block_download_in_sandboxed_iframes

Re: Firefox 93

#100
post #91

Here's what I desperately want from Firefox, which I currently have from Chrome: isolated browser profiles tied to an account. I have two browser windows open at all times, one for my personal stuff and one for my work stuff. I want to keep those two windows totally isolated, where I log in with all my work accounts in one window, and all my personal accounts in the other window. Chrome does this by tying the window…

Firefox has supported this for decades, it just doesn't have a very nice UI for managing it.

Simply start it with "firefox -P" and create two separate profiles (call them "work" and "personal"). Then just start two instances of Firefox, with "firefox -P work" and "firefox -P personal". They will be totally isolated - cookies, history, addons, everything.

Post reply on HN