Earlier quoted context omitted.
Leave.EU Group Limited: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/who-we-are-and-what-w... Conclusion: Leave.EU was ultimately fined £66,000 in total after their appeal. Vote Leave Ltd: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/who-we-are-and-what-w... Conclusion: commission found evidence, issued fines, most significant fines appealed, commission lost appeal and paid costs. Investigation into payments made to Better for t…
I'm genuinely confused by this: In 2018, Grimes was fined £20,000 by the Electoral Commission after it determined that there was evidence that BeLeave had spent more than £675,000 with the Canadian political consultancy firm AggregateIQ in coordination with the official Brexit campaign organisation Vote Leave in distribution targeted social media advertisements.[24] The Commission argued that these actions violated e…
The specific offence was that there was collusion between BeLeave and Vote Leave which ultimately meant that money spent by BeLeave was actually supporting Vote Leave's campaign, which was not lawful.
Both 'parties' were fined - Vote Leave and BeLeave/Darren Grimes.
The judge who overturned Grimes's fine did not pass judgement on whether the spending was lawful or not.
The appeal was upheld based on the ruling that the Electoral Commission had not properly done their homework to prove BeLeave's legal status, or justify the maximum fine permissible for Grimes - essentially a procedural error, rather than a factual error.