> there should be no trouble at all for a driver to understand, when seeing the full rear of the car, which direction is being indicated. This response from Mini presumes drivers have the luxury of using "system 2" logical/analytical reasoning in a hectic realtime environment where they must most rely on "system 1" intuitive reasoning. There needs to be a name for this type design fallacy, because it's not the first…
I suppose the Mini designers have never driven in fog, poor lighting, storms, or at night? (When you might not see the full rear of the car)
Imagine if you can only see the car's taillights and you see a blinking arrow move the opposite way it points. What would you think you saw?
Or better yet, if one of the taillights is out, what would a driver behind the Mini think?