Live data from Hacker News

Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

telegra.ph

151–160 of 179 posts

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>and buyers of those bonds are affiliated with Russia structures like VTB Capital bank or Russian Government investment fund named “Russian Fund of Direct Investments”. As far as i know, it's not true(meaning there are no signs/proof of that). It's entirely possible, durov does have connections in russian elite, after all he was the creator of vk.com russian most popular social network. Vk was owned by russian oligar…

> End of TON project, ment an end of telegram's future as a not data harvesting company. Durov can ask any day of the month for a donation and I'll give it as soon as I have money in hand. $10 - $100, no problem, more in 6 months. In fact even if he bust released a dumb sticker collection I'd buy it just to support Telegram even if I don't use stickers. I guess this holds true for many other ex-Whatsapp enthusiasts a…

do you think a lot of people would be willing to donate to telegram? what would be an average annual donation per user? I bet it would be a lot less than what big tech makes, and there is no reason to believe durov would settle for that

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#152
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are no good smartphone messaging apps. XMPP with OMEMO is the best you can do currently.

It's not. It doesn't work with iOS in practice and requires you to verify each single session instead of just a the people to prevent MITM attacks. Afaik it does not have any audit either

> requires you to verify each single session instead of just a the people

What do you mean by that? When no new devices are introduced you only have to verify the fingerprint of each contact once (via QR code).

> Afaik it does not have any audit either

https://conversations.im/omemo/audit.pdf

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#153
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt many here are still under the illusion that Telegram has anything to do with security or encrypted messaging. (It's just too damn convenient for UX reasons.) That's not the same as a "wild west of free speech", though. I have no idea how well they do on the front of censorship, they're way too intransparent an organisation for that, but the USA also sees itself as such and it is not encrypted. Secure protocol…

Same here. Great user experience and developer experience too (compaire their bot api to other platforms).

[deleted]

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#154
post #41

Apple pushing requirements on apps is also (supposedly) why a lot of apps (such as Instagram, which had explicitly come out to blame Apple for this) banned content of women breastfeeding, as Apple (due to Steve Jobs: there is some interesting stuff you can find on this) is so puritan. You can also find tons of other examples of Apple's influence making decisions about what large numbers of people can experience, ofte…

> as Apple (due to Steve Jobs: there is some interesting stuff you can find on this) is so puritan.

As this "puritanism" is an interest of mine, can you point me to some of that interesting stuff you had in mind, please?

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#155
post #41

Apple pushing requirements on apps is also (supposedly) why a lot of apps (such as Instagram, which had explicitly come out to blame Apple for this) banned content of women breastfeeding, as Apple (due to Steve Jobs: there is some interesting stuff you can find on this) is so puritan. You can also find tons of other examples of Apple's influence making decisions about what large numbers of people can experience, ofte…

> Apple has thereby made an active choice to build a product that is bad for democracy That's a good point, actually. If a company wants to claim that they are on the side of users and democracy, it needs to include in its threat modelling the possibility of "Are we the baddies?".

Wasn't that what Google meant to do when they carried the slogan "don't be evil"?

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not saying it could become either. Saying that it isn't is a bold claim to be backed up by proper arguments

The original claim is the one which requires evidence, much harder to prove a negative.

the original claim is:

> Signal is the most trusted app in authoritarian countries.

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#157
post #41

Apple pushing requirements on apps is also (supposedly) why a lot of apps (such as Instagram, which had explicitly come out to blame Apple for this) banned content of women breastfeeding, as Apple (due to Steve Jobs: there is some interesting stuff you can find on this) is so puritan. You can also find tons of other examples of Apple's influence making decisions about what large numbers of people can experience, ofte…

> as Apple (due to Steve Jobs: there is some interesting stuff you can find on this) is so puritan. As this "puritanism" is an interest of mine, can you point me to some of that interesting stuff you had in mind, please?

I mean, did you at least try to search 'Steve Jobs puritan' on Google? That has some information, though 'Steve Jobs porn' is probably better (and immediately turns up most of the references I would push someone towards).

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#158
post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> as Apple (due to Steve Jobs: there is some interesting stuff you can find on this) is so puritan. As this "puritanism" is an interest of mine, can you point me to some of that interesting stuff you had in mind, please?

I mean, did you at least try to search 'Steve Jobs puritan' on Google? That has some information, though 'Steve Jobs porn' is probably better (and immediately turns up most of the references I would push someone towards).

My question is whether the GGP had something specific in mind.

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#159
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When Russia wanted some kind of encryption keys he could not hand over because they dont exist, Telegram was banned in Russia but people found ways to use it anyway. So I dont think Russia has anything to "force" Durov other than via Apple/Google. He doesn't live there or owns anything there and according to past posts of him and there are no Telegram servers there either. + The proxy stuff to circumvent Russia's ban…

There is a sideloaded version of Telegram for Android which can be installed from it's website and even is able to auto-update itself. It allows access to content blocked on iOS. But it was unable to access voting bot.

I dont think bots have the flags for blocking only in some apps like channels and groups have.

The bot runs on someone else machine and telegram most likely just temporary disabled the token to disable the bot from communicating with the telegram bot API. This then ofc affects all front ends/apps.

Re: Why Telegram had to follow Apple and Google when they suspended a voting app

#160
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a sideloaded version of Telegram for Android which can be installed from it's website and even is able to auto-update itself. It allows access to content blocked on iOS. But it was unable to access voting bot.

I dont think bots have the flags for blocking only in some apps like channels and groups have. The bot runs on someone else machine and telegram most likely just temporary disabled the token to disable the bot from communicating with the telegram bot API. This then ofc affects all front ends/apps.

Client was showing something like "this content is illegal" instead of bot answers. It is now showing the original answers instead of these placeholders, which means the data was always there, it was just replaced on the fly for accounts with Russian registration.
Post reply on HN