Leaked grant proposal details high-risk coronavirus research

Post by theduder99 » Sat, Sep 25, 2021, 12:57 AM UTC

brendoelfrendo wrote: post #146

sjwalter wrote: post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This whole narrative was revealed ages ago by internet reporters, particularly by Dr. Chris Martenson of peakprosperity.com. What's not being reported even in this Intercept article is that Fauci and the Eco Health Alliance are heavily involved with each other. One week before Daszak et al released their ridiculous "lab leak is a conspiracy theory" Lancet article, as revealed in Fauci's emails (which supposedly revea…

I've never heard of peakprosperity.com, but it seems to be a site geared towards preppers/libertarians/those who are already predisposed to a lack of institutional trust. You can claim he's data driven and level headed, but the context that he's operating in--and the audience that he's speaking to--tells me that he's probably not being unbiased in his analysis.

Post by brendoelfrendo » Sat, Sep 25, 2021, 1:02 AM UTC

theduder99 wrote: post #151

brendoelfrendo wrote: post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never heard of peakprosperity.com, but it seems to be a site geared towards preppers/libertarians/those who are already predisposed to a lack of institutional trust. You can claim he's data driven and level headed, but the context that he's operating in--and the audience that he's speaking to--tells me that he's probably not being unbiased in his analysis.

please send me some good sites which produce unbiased analysis, thanks.

Post by [deleted] » Sat, Sep 25, 2021, 1:03 AM UTC

015a wrote: post #103

martythemaniak wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've asked people to explain to me why I should care one way or another, beyond curiosity, and no one has been able to answer yet. That is to say, is there an actual person who is perfectly fine with all the terrible things the CCP plainly does, but finding out that they've been incompetently handling research will suddenly make them change their views?

The reason why you need to care is because this isn't a CCP problem; its a global problem. Sure, maybe the CCP screwed up containment, and that mistake cost millions of lives. Every single major government around the planet has facilities like the one we're discussing. Every single one has made mistakes like the CCP possibly did. The CCP were just unlucky in that their mistake wasn't confined to one person or the wel…

Post by teh_klev » Sat, Sep 25, 2021, 1:06 AM UTC

djenendik wrote: post #154

teh_klev wrote: post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't want to diminish the work of "epidemiologist"'s but they aren't virologists. They're ultimately specialised statisticians and shouldn't have any say in how or what research is carried out.

Only a virologist should tell another virologist what to do. Got it.

Post by teh_klev » Sat, Sep 25, 2021, 1:14 AM UTC

leereeves wrote: post #158

teh_klev wrote: post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't want to diminish the work of "epidemiologist"'s but they aren't virologists. They're ultimately specialised statisticians and shouldn't have any say in how or what research is carried out.

Epidemiologists study the spread of diseases and their impact on communities. That's an important factor to consider when judging the potential impact of risky research, and it's not something virologists are trained in.