COBOL – Still standing the test of time
11–20 of 104 posts
Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#12Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#13Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?
Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#14Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?
Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#15I've always thought that the reason COBOL is still "popular" is that it became an entrenched technology many years ago, and the cost of replacement is high enough (and it works fine doing what it's doing) that no one wants to invest the time and money to replace it's usage. This quote made me pause though, "COBOL remains the preferred choice for systems where application quality and operating cost remain important co…
At the time, the cost of an outage was estimated in the $100K's per minute, and is likely significantly higher now.
When I moved away from FinServ, I found it surprising at first how cavalier some orgs are about ripping/replacing core services in the name of "modernization". Move fast & break things and all of that...
Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#16Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?
Pleasant, relaxed bunch.
Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#17Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#18I've always thought that the reason COBOL is still "popular" is that it became an entrenched technology many years ago, and the cost of replacement is high enough (and it works fine doing what it's doing) that no one wants to invest the time and money to replace it's usage. This quote made me pause though, "COBOL remains the preferred choice for systems where application quality and operating cost remain important co…
>the cost of replacement is high enough (and it works fine doing what it's doing) that no one wants to invest the time and money to replace it's usage
That's pretty much what it is. They're not hard to manage as they are and ... doing their thing.
Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#19Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?
Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time
#20Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?
Nowadays a "mainframe" is just a 1U server and it's incredible how some old names in IT can still charge enormous fees for some very old software.