Live data from Hacker News

COBOL – Still standing the test of time

blog.microfocus.com

11–20 of 104 posts

Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time

#14
post #12

Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?

I used to do consulting in banks. I met several Cobol programmers. However, they thought of their role as CICS programmers. CICS is a mainframe transaction management tool. All of them also did assembly in CICS.

Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time

#15

I've always thought that the reason COBOL is still "popular" is that it became an entrenched technology many years ago, and the cost of replacement is high enough (and it works fine doing what it's doing) that no one wants to invest the time and money to replace it's usage. This quote made me pause though, "COBOL remains the preferred choice for systems where application quality and operating cost remain important co…

I spent ~7 years or so at one of the large credit card companies. The adage "if it isn't broke, don't fix it" was very prevalent there, and anything that even hinted at touching the core payment processing code was scrutinized heavily and usually avoided entirely.

At the time, the cost of an outage was estimated in the $100K's per minute, and is likely significantly higher now.

When I moved away from FinServ, I found it surprising at first how cavalier some orgs are about ripping/replacing core services in the name of "modernization". Move fast & break things and all of that...

Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time

#16
post #12

Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?

I met some Cobol programmers in an open office space at a bank.

Pleasant, relaxed bunch.

Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time

#18

I've always thought that the reason COBOL is still "popular" is that it became an entrenched technology many years ago, and the cost of replacement is high enough (and it works fine doing what it's doing) that no one wants to invest the time and money to replace it's usage. This quote made me pause though, "COBOL remains the preferred choice for systems where application quality and operating cost remain important co…

I manage some ColdFusion apps still going strong.

>the cost of replacement is high enough (and it works fine doing what it's doing) that no one wants to invest the time and money to replace it's usage

That's pretty much what it is. They're not hard to manage as they are and ... doing their thing.

Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time

#19
post #12

Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?

My job involves a lot of projects with IBM i and Z so I meet a lot of them. It's pretty much the "greybeards" you'd expect, but also surprisingly there's a LOT of older women in these roles. Like, proportionally way more than an in open systems world in my experience. I've always wondered why that is, I have heard that programming used to be considered a "woman's job" so maybe that's it.

Re: COBOL – Still standing the test of time

#20
post #12

Has anyone ever actually met a COBOL programmer? It seems like the teachers tale of someone cracking their head open while swinging on their chair - presumably they exist but there can't be that many of them?

I worked with some at a bank (of course).

Nowadays a "mainframe" is just a 1U server and it's incredible how some old names in IT can still charge enormous fees for some very old software.

Post reply on HN