Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
1–10 of 36 posts
Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#2Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#3Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#4> is it actually feasible for the U.S. military to hit back with "overwhelming force"?
> The answer to that is a solid "NO!"
> To hit back with "overwhelming force", they need to figure out what they are going hit.
...
> either the U.S. would have to hit Taliban forces that are now dispersed through Kabul thereby killing a whole lot of innocents or they would have to try to go after the leadership. Where are they going to find them? If they are in densely populated in Kabul and they drop a MOAB on them, who's going to be accountable for the civilian lives lost? Besides, neither of this would stop the slaughter at the airport: It would just add to the physical and propaganda victories of the Taliban.
Clearly, I had not imagined them bringing up ISK to distract from the fact that they are dealing with the Taliban, but the notion that they could effectively fight a threat mingled with the population of a large, chaotic city where they had no actual eyes on the ground was a farce. They killed this guy and the little children just so they could look like they were doing something.
Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#5Before the event, I commented[1] on the military claiming they could hit back with "overwhelming force" if anyone attacked them: > is it actually feasible for the U.S. military to hit back with "overwhelming force"? > The answer to that is a solid "NO!" > To hit back with "overwhelming force", they need to figure out what they are going hit. ... > either the U.S. would have to hit Taliban forces that are now disperse…
Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#6Yes, it’s horrible. I’ll be outraged for an evening.
But what can I ultimately do against the bloodthirsty behemoth that is the US government?
If it’s something like Amazon I can choose not to give them my money. But if I’m disillusioned with the entire way one (or maybe all) of the largest countries on the earth operate, what can I do?
Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#7I’m so tired of these stories. Yes, it’s horrible. I’ll be outraged for an evening. But what can I ultimately do against the bloodthirsty behemoth that is the US government? If it’s something like Amazon I can choose not to give them my money. But if I’m disillusioned with the entire way one (or maybe all) of the largest countries on the earth operate, what can I do?
Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#8I’m so tired of these stories. Yes, it’s horrible. I’ll be outraged for an evening. But what can I ultimately do against the bloodthirsty behemoth that is the US government? If it’s something like Amazon I can choose not to give them my money. But if I’m disillusioned with the entire way one (or maybe all) of the largest countries on the earth operate, what can I do?
Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#9I’m so tired of these stories. Yes, it’s horrible. I’ll be outraged for an evening. But what can I ultimately do against the bloodthirsty behemoth that is the US government? If it’s something like Amazon I can choose not to give them my money. But if I’m disillusioned with the entire way one (or maybe all) of the largest countries on the earth operate, what can I do?
Move to a small well run country?
Re: Times Investigation: In U.S. Drone Strike, Evidence Suggests No Isis Bomb
#10In fact, estimates say about 200 people died in total. But evidence also suggests the bomb may have killed only a few dozen.