Live data from Hacker News

OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

whitehouse.gov

51–60 of 1001 posts

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#51

I refuse to comply with this over reach and I’m fully vaccinated

I vaccinated within days of becoming eligible and I'm 100% against this mandate. To such an extent that I'll become a single-issue voter over it.

I would be with you if it weren’t for the “or test” part. “You must get vaccinated” would be problematic, but “you must do a COVID test once a week if you’re not vaccinated” is totally reasonable IMO.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#52

What's that term for the fusion of state and corporate power?

Since the only person who answered properly was (correctly) flagged and banned, I'll answer your rhetorical question as accurately as I can:

Italian Fascism promoted a corporatist economic system whereby employer and employee syndicates are linked together in associations to collectively represent the nation's economic producers and work alongside the state to set national economic policy.[0]

[0] Andrew Vincent. Modern Political Ideologies. Third edition. Malden, Massaschussetts, USA; Oxford, England, UK; West Sussex, England, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 2010. Pp. 160. URL: https://books.google.com/books/about/Modern_Political_Ideolo...

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it alters the risk/benefit calculus. A sterilizing vaccine that stops transmission in its tracks, has a clear public health benefit to every part of society, even if there are risks. A non-sterilizing vaccine does not provide that society-wide public health benefit, leaving the employer to bear risks without benefit.

But the COVID vaccine does provide a society-wide public health benefit. Our best available data indicates that it reduces the risk of transmission, even for Delta [1]. 1. https://www.acsh.org/news/2021/09/07/covid-19-vaccines-preve...

Vaccination likely reduces the chance of transmission in any single interaction. However even with a high level of vaccination all of us can expect to be occasionally exposed to the virus no matter what steps we take. The benefits of vaccination are really more about protecting yourself from severe symptoms, and preventing demand spikes on the healthcare system.

https://www.businessinsider.com/delta-variant-made-herd-immu...

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sadly, there won't be nearly enough who feel as you do. But I wholeheartedly applaud your statement!

Created this throwaway to say that there are at least some others who agree but are too scared of the current cultural tone to speak openly about this. I feel thoroughly alienated from my peer-group and family over their fervor for this response and against any who disagree.

Trust me, you are most definitely not alone. Most are like you - quietly going about your business, keeping a low profile.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#55
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

absolutely. I was hired this year to learn how the hell all the complicated stuff the 55- and 65-year-old programmers do every day works, and I've only learned a fraction of it so far.

Seems they filled the position as recently as 7 months ago.

Right, but there was a source of knowledge (the two older employees) to obtain information from. If one of those older employees is irreplaceable, and they leave, it's going to seriously impact production systems.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I vaccinated within days of becoming eligible and I'm 100% against this mandate. To such an extent that I'll become a single-issue voter over it.

I would be with you if it weren’t for the “or test” part. “You must get vaccinated” would be problematic, but “you must do a COVID test once a week if you’re not vaccinated” is totally reasonable IMO.

Give it a few months. First they will pass the costs onto the employee, then they will take away the option altogether. Mark my words.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think “prevent” is too imprecise a term here. The vaccines don’t eliminate the risk of spreading the virus to others. They do materially reduce the risk of spreading the virus to others.

They increase the risk of asymptomatic transmission, because vaccines suppress the symptoms of infection, which would otherwise signal the infected person to quarantine. The CDC says this can be addressed by regular testing of the vaccinated, https://archive.is/PW9SP > The agency now advises that vaccinated people be tested for the virus if they come into contact with someone with Covid-19, even if they have no sympt…

> symptoms of infection, which would otherwise signal the infected person to quarantine

I'm not sure that people who have chosen not to get vaccinated by this point are going to be the people who follow self-quarantine rules well.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would be with you if it weren’t for the “or test” part. “You must get vaccinated” would be problematic, but “you must do a COVID test once a week if you’re not vaccinated” is totally reasonable IMO.

Give it a few months. First they will pass the costs onto the employee, then they will take away the option altogether. Mark my words.

With a $14k fine per violation, I doubt most employers will give employees the option to test weekly. That's too much of a liability.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#59
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They increase the risk of asymptomatic transmission, because vaccines suppress the symptoms of infection, which would otherwise signal the infected person to quarantine. The CDC says this can be addressed by regular testing of the vaccinated, https://archive.is/PW9SP > The agency now advises that vaccinated people be tested for the virus if they come into contact with someone with Covid-19, even if they have no sympt…

> symptoms of infection, which would otherwise signal the infected person to quarantine I'm not sure that people who have chosen not to get vaccinated by this point are going to be the people who follow self-quarantine rules well.

Some of those who have chosen not to get vaccinated are those already recovered from Covid, who now have natural immunity. This includes many essential workers and first responders, who worked throughout 2020 without the protection of a vaccine.

That leaves the subset of non-immune people who are unvaccinated. If this hypothetical person is reckless (as your comment suggests), should they not have already been infected in the past 18 months? If they were not infected in 18 months, that suggests at least some ability to isolate and self-monitor.

Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Give it a few months. First they will pass the costs onto the employee, then they will take away the option altogether. Mark my words.

With a $14k fine per violation, I doubt most employers will give employees the option to test weekly. That's too much of a liability.

Especially considering the load this will put on laboratories.
Post reply on HN