This also represents that Windows and Mac OS are no longer the only operating systems. Chrome and Firefox are closely equivalent. And Chrome is the leader with its dominance on Android and Desktop systems. iOS is the only threat left and if any of the anti-trust measures against Apple are able to break Apple’s grip on the iOS enough to let Chrome or an equivalent browser act as an OS equivalent to what Chrome could d…
The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
171–180 of 256 posts
Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#172Don't drink the Kool Aid. We have been doing multiplatform development for a long time. It is in our company's interest not to depend on a single provider(like Apple, MS or Google) for anything. It is also in those single provider interests to make you depend on them as much as they can, because every company wants to become a monopoly. If you can not change provider overnight, they have a virtual monopoly over you.…
"Technologies like objective C, C sharp, Azure or swift are designed so you can not escape the company platform. So easy to get in, so hard to move your code to other platforms once you have been programming for years on them." FYI, Swift is available on Linux and Windows along with a significant chunk of its core libraries (e.g. https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation ) and app frameworks such as Vapor (u…
The only part of cross-platform support that's a little wonky is the GUI, but that's because Forms is just a thin wrapper over the Win32 forms API and WPF was built around DirectX. But that should get a lot better in a couple months when Microsoft releases MAUI (Multi-Platform App UI).
Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
Microsoft has destroyed the Windows desktop singlehandedly on their own. Since Win8 and “Metro” they moved away from having consistent UI widgets like it was in Windows 2000 or XP but instead made the Windows desktop a Wild West if different UI paradigms. Even the ribbon introduced a new UI paradigm that wasn’t available to third party devs. If even MS themselves doesn’t bother to be consistent then developers certai…
Well that's all well and good but it doesn't explain why even Mac OS devs are moving en masse to building for the web.
The Mac platform also used to be very insulated; the culture meant that the prospect of creating an app or simple utility and selling it was viable much longer than it was on Windows, where the culture is that everything is either gratis-style free or warez-style free. The invasion of the Web means that Mac users are increasingly being conditioned to get things for free, too, so the viability of paid apps has taken a big hit. SaaS is the way to make money now.
Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#174Desktop is coming back.
This is the future we've built for ourselves, and we don't even have the decency to be ashamed of it.
Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment saddens me.
When I see Chromebooks being mentioned, I always think about "One Tablet Per Child" charity from Person of Interest show. (Slight spoiler for season 4) Giving every child in the country a free tablet with Internet access, loaded with quality educational software sounds like a great good, but is it so good if it also comes loaded with surveillance equipment and is controlled by a malicious AI attempting to control hum…
Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#176Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
yea but chromium has been ported to everything so your app will work exactly the same on any device chromium runs, that's the issue with writing native apps.. you then have to port it to all the devices and update on OS changes.
Qt works in more places than chromium and is much more native - it's even the native platform for multiple OSes
Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#178Are there any solid statistics on what “users” demand? This keeps being thrown around: “users want, demand and need native desktop applications”. Who are these users? Under what circumstances do they “want” such things?
I want native apps because my bought RAM and CPU cycles are precious resources: they shouldn't be treated like a "free for all" by lazy devs. Not every native dev uses these sparingly, but in my professional experience, web devs often don't even consider it being a factor during development.
I want web apps to run in my web browser, so I can apply privacy-enabling plugins to them like uBlock. I also don't want web apps implementing dark patterns to get me into their hybrid app. (e.g. MS Teams forcing me to reconsider every time I open the website)
Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#179There are "sellers" and "buyers". The sellers are the developers. The buyers are the users. Real money is often involved in the transaction.
Where do sellers go? Where there are the most buyers!
Where do buyers go? Where there are the most sellers!
Hence, marketplaces with no physical constraints are natural monopolies. This includes auction houses (eBay) and GUI platforms.
Previously, Windows had an over 90% market share, and it was glorious as a developer. You write your code once, and it works "everywhere", because everywhere is just Windows. The 9% Mac users are out of luck, and nobody cared about the mish-mash of 1% other.
Now the web is the new 90%. Or more specifically, Chromium is, with over 80% and climbing.
What saddens me is that Microsoft threw what they had away, and continue to do so. I've never seen a company more keen to undermine their own market position.
Re: The web is swallowing the desktop whole (2017)
#180The Linux desktop finally succeeded even though nobody is running Linux on their desktops. Hooray indirect wins!
40 million Chromebooks will be shipped in 2021!