Would be nice to have more communities dedicated to bloat-free, user-respecting UX... that are not complete pro-hitler neonazis like the suckless clique. I'm all ears for links and suggestions!
What do you mean? I didn't know anything about them until this thread, and then there is this comment[0] where one of the devs clearly states: 1. They don't politicise in their group 2. The commenter literally says: "Torch hikes are nothing unusual in Germany and there was no political intent behind it." What's the issue then? Serious question and relevant to the thread because I too would love to see more communitie…
The rise of user-hostile software
11–20 of 303 posts
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#12Would be nice to have more communities dedicated to bloat-free, user-respecting UX... that are not complete pro-hitler neonazis like the suckless clique. I'm all ears for links and suggestions!
> pro-hitler neonazis hyperbole?
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#13Would be nice to have more communities dedicated to bloat-free, user-respecting UX... that are not complete pro-hitler neonazis like the suckless clique. I'm all ears for links and suggestions!
> pro-hitler neonazis hyperbole?
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#14Would be nice to have more communities dedicated to bloat-free, user-respecting UX... that are not complete pro-hitler neonazis like the suckless clique. I'm all ears for links and suggestions!
please check https://1mb.club/ related HN thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25151773 https://10kbclub.com/ R HN T : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25556860
I'd be interested to have a more generic community in the spirit of suckless, though maybe not as radical in its interpretation of minimalism.
From the recent threads about Haiku OS, i gather that implementing features/UX is not incompatible with respecting user resources. That's what i'm interested in.
I also follow gemini protocol development, the Jabber/XMPP community, and i'm also a member on rawtext.club (an SSH social network where i'm not as active there as i should be).
I'd be interested in a cross-project platform much like suckless to gather such lightweight programs/protocols, if you can think of any.
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
> pro-hitler neonazis hyperbole?
Wow, it seems the discussion hit the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law really quick.
In this case, i agree with the suckless arguments, but i'm considering serious evidence that key contributors to the suckless community are actual neonazis, and that the community at large seems ok with it because they claim to be non-political (see other comments).
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#16Would be nice to have more communities dedicated to bloat-free, user-respecting UX... that are not complete pro-hitler neonazis like the suckless clique. I'm all ears for links and suggestions!
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Suckless.org https://lobste.rs/s/kpuj8p/why_i_use_suckless_tools#c_4g2lqi
[flagged]
We shouldn't normalise bad interpretations regardless of our own biases.
They have said they're not, so we should take them at face value. Let's now focus on participating to achieve the shared goals of good user-software without bloat, spyware, and other crap that makes up modern technology.
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#18"Natural selection" at work. Sad, of course.
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Suckless.org https://lobste.rs/s/kpuj8p/why_i_use_suckless_tools#c_4g2lqi
[flagged]
Germany has very tough laws against glorifying the Nazi regime, so if they are Germans it’s not just sick humor but deliberate.
Though Suckless vs. Poetering seems like a Hitler vs. Stalin evil-fights-evil situation best avoided by giving both a wide berth.
Re: The rise of user-hostile software
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This seems like a lot of jumping to conclusions to fit your pre-determined opinion of them. Without derailing the thread, I do think we all need to extend charity to people who have openly declared what their affiliations are not . We shouldn't normalise bad interpretations regardless of our own biases. They have said they're not, so we should take them at face value. Let's now focus on participating to achieve the s…
If only it were that simple.