Live data from Hacker News

OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

variety.com

151–160 of 1001 posts

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#151
post #30

Isn't "OnlyFans without sexual content" basically Patreon?

I think there are more users of Patreon that uses it as a subscription donation service than there are on OnlyFans, with the primary content being available for free to anyone. Game reviews, mods and web comics comes to mind. I have no idea how large portion of the primary customer base those are for patreon.

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#152

My biggest shock was how much "PR" was generated on Reddit, and how many sexworkers really do use the platform. I knew it was a thing, I knew of the memes, but to see both sides in arms over a company vs branding, creating their own website and content - and vanity domain as well. People really do just want a one click solution for creating adult content, and consuming adult content. And the memes, I think they're pr…

it's pretty huge COVID hit recently graduated Gen-Z incredibly hard. There's huge groups that are/were unemployed and then there's huge groups who are sexually repressed due to quarantine. Across the whole world, too*. Many can easily make more than min wage, and in certain niches you probably don't even have to be 'conventionally beautiful' (sorry to use this term, but it's important I think) to make a living or sol…

> COVID hit recently graduated Gen-Z incredibly hard

Aren’t women over-represented on the supply side while men on the demand side though? I don’t think gen-z as a wholesale cohort makes sense.

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it should be noted that she is a brilliant individual it should NOT be noted. Too many good people died in the wars of past centuries to get us to the freedom and liberty we enjoy today to let any fundamentalists dictate what a normal job is and who works it. Sex work is work and if you dislike it you'd might enjoy Afghanistan these days.

The amount of anger and negativity in this comment is shocking. The work she does is often stereotyped as being "dumb" or non-intellectual. To fight that idea, OP found it valuable to mention how smart she is and how these platorms provide a safe and profitable way to provide for her child. Ask yourself - and I mean really ask yourself - what about that statement has you so angry?

I think it's the implication that sex work is inherently beneath someone who is "brilliant."

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Getting a degree in a field that has jobs helps too.

Doesn’t help when you don’t have the foot in the door because your family is not traditionally professional. I had to ask one of my old graduate project partners for a referral to my current (and first, at 27) tech job and I still feel dirty and guilty that I got it so easily and managed to escape the trap of being extremely qualified while making min wage in a dusty shithole of a warehouse. “It’s not what you know,…

Every single job I've had in my adult life (I'm 42 years old now) was because I knew someone. It pays to know people and make friends/connections.

I got started with an unpaid internship in high school (every school should require that) and life grew out of that.

[edit] And my family was anything but "traditionally professional." I had no connections whatsoever through my family.

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#156

As a Gen-Z also recently graduated (less than 5 years), I can assure you, the fact these platforms are so big is because being graduated isn't worth anything these days. You are lucky or you are not.

That’s troubling. I don’t know where you live but at least in my locale many employers seem hesitant to hire newly-grads, even if they need to increase staff. Many companies seem to expect some other company to take care of the training.

A degree is nice but until someone has gained experience that person first needs a company to take a chance on them.

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#157
post #72

My understanding was that they were being cut off by payment processors and banks and that drove the decision. Was this resolved?

I would also like to know on whether it's possible for someone to start their own payment processors? There are tutorials on how to start an ISP, so should be possible for payment processors too no?

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Well, not just elites. This is the policy everyone voted for: less taxes (causing young folks to go heavily into debt for worthless degree credentials), less social safety nets, a generational wealth transfer from the young to the old. The results are exactly what you’d expect, and older generations should absolutely be worried when their cohort has shrunk through death to a minority voting bloc.

I don’t think taxes on regular people have dropped, we simply pretend social Security, Medicare, State and local, + fees don’t count as taxes. Which means we can “lower” federal taxes by providing less federal support to state projects.

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#159
post #2

Wonder if this was all a publicity stunt to put pressure on their payment processors.

One effect of the proposed ban would presumably to motivate content creators to look for alternative platforms. If it was a publicity stunt it seems like it would have had a pretty big downside.

Re: OnlyFans drops planned porn ban

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Investments aren’t loans, so you don’t have to pay it back the way a loan might be.

Thanks, I guess I was wrong on that count. It makes sense. The first part continues to baffle me. If I have a proven profit of $X/year and I have the market captured (speaking on the order of 10% or 50%, doesn't matter), how does it make sense to seek investment in the order of 100*X? What's the goal? Why not just keep milking the proven cash cow and stop growing and risking?

That's a different strategy - you can be shooting for a sustainable medium size company, or try to become a tech behemoth.

Both choices are valids, but investors tend to push you towards growing forever. So if your board is already controlled by investors (as opposed to founders or employees), they'll encourage you to raise more to grow more.

Post reply on HN