Live data from Hacker News

Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

slate.com

191–200 of 233 posts

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are still places on the Croatian Adriatic which aren’t over run with tourists. Of course the popular areas are extremely crowded. There are still other beautiful islands which are not so busy. I’m writing this from a small 20 tent only campsite on a Croatian island. Access is only by ferry. Facilities are limited (no large supermarkets for example). It’s our third summer here and while there have been some chan…

Wifi or 3/4g?

LTE mobile data

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The recommendation, remember? The research? She was a PhD student.

Technically, just to be that guy, she worked all the extra time and was compensated for it with a recommendation.

That would be fine if that was the initial offer. But it wasn't. It was a bait and switch. It wasn't until she was trapped that they pulled her pay.

That's criminal, and it's worrying you're justifying it under an account named "Workaccount2"

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#193
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Falklands is much closer to Argentina though - they should belong to Argentina by right of proximity.

Do you have any more info on this right of proximity? It’s nearer to me so it’s mine is that about it?

Sorry, I was trying to satirise the argument for why it should be Argentinian, where the fundamental (but generally unsaid) reason is "because it's close to us".

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US is actually bizarre, anyone born in the US automatically gets US nationality. This leads to amusing birth tourism. Iirc it is the only country that does this.

It's not unique to the US at all. Almost all the countries in North and South America are like this. If you want to claim it's wrong that's another debate but everyone in the Americas came from somewhere else, borders are an ephemeral concept and what's bizarre to me is how strict Europe is with jus sanguinis when its borders have changed so many times in the last century and in the centuries leading up to it. I do b…

I think what curbs the immigration to Spain is its economic situation(15% unemployment rate), plus I wouldn't say that Spain has tough immigration rules. In 2020 11% of of people living in Spain were foreign nationals: https://www.ine.es/prensa/cp_e2020_p.pdf

Out of these 11% only a third were from EU (including Great Britain), 6.5% of the foreign nationals were from Latin America, taking 5 out of the 15 countries from which most Immigrants come from, and the biggest year to year increase in immigration is from Venezuela (39.8%), Colombia (31.3%) and Honduras (29.4%).

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#195
post #152
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> priority queue if you must with priority being given by a random number generator tempered with both nonsense You cannot sensibly call this a "queue". No programmer would accept "random order" when they expected "in order". Moreover, decisions are independent . The number of people already accepted is not a factor in individual immigration decisions! Someone else getting accepted cannot affect the outcome of your o…

Obviously the priority is /meant/ to be sensibly arrived at. The rest was commentary on how sensible it is likely to actually be in practice, with a nod to your assertions about it which seem at least plausible. I simply don't believe decisions are entirely independent. I strongly doubt the public servants making those decisions have it in the power to increase the rate of immigration tenfold based on individuals mee…

> I strongly doubt the public servants making those decisions have it in the power to increase the rate of immigration tenfold based on individuals meeting criteria without political support.

It is clear that there is high political prioritization of rejecting as many applications as possible, despite what the criteria actually say and whether the criteria are met. Once people manage to appeal to the real courts, rather than the politically controlled asylum process, most of the decisions are overturned. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/03/inhumane-thr...

The number could be significantly increased by simply taking their own stated rules at face value rather than rejecting valid applications.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's it like in Serbia, do Chinese oligarchs own everything?

The Chinese are buying up Serbia's industry and mining. They provide jobs and money but care nothing for the environment.

Yeah it seems like that in that area. I've seen similar in Hungary. They are just using peoples' grievances with US and EU as an opening to get in and take economic control slowly.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#198
post #17

"...(the only access to the islands) is to have a pre-arranged job contract with a company that has signed a form of bond taking responsibility for you" That sounds like all British immigration rules. My employer had to apply for my visa and had to pay all my healthcare contributions for a year up front before I could move for a job in London. If I lose my job I have a few weeks to find a new employer (who will have…

My American in laws did expat life in UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, others in the region. They, and many other western expats, employed Filipino house keepers. They have to assume a lot of responsibility for their actions while in the country as well. The expats are there under-highly conditional work visas and employeeing low-wage expats to come into the country was like another level of liability they took on personally and could blow up their work visa status if something really went wrong. It was normal for the expats to take their worker's passport and the Filipino's were basically trapped, and they wouldn't always have a car or any mode of transportation. I recall their biggest fear was if she got pregnant while in their "care" it was almost like the child was their responsibility or if she had some relationship with a married guy it would be a big issue (paraphrased hearsay...). It sounded horrible, but in reality it mostly worked since the western expats were not exploitative but the opportunity is more than present. My understanding is the natives imported labor in a highly exploitive way (low wage labor camps, etc).

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#199

Don't go. My young friend went on contract for a year, doing fishery research. After a few months they said "We aren't going to pay you any more. You can't leave because the boat won't come back until {whenever}. And if you say anything, we won't give you the recommendation you need as a young researcher doing a PhD." She had to stay for months working for nothing. It's slavery, and they know it, and that's how it wo…

I stopped at M.S., but I know many Ph.D.'s.

The horror stories of things they endure would fill hundreds of volumes. One told me another prof just stole her dissertation topic, and she lost two years. Innumerable others get caught in academic politics because another prof doesn't like theirs.

As many people say below, being a whistleblower brings a heavy personal cost, and no one should say "you should publicize this" without being aware of that.

Re: Why do so many people move to the Falkland Islands? (2009)

#200
post #17

"...(the only access to the islands) is to have a pre-arranged job contract with a company that has signed a form of bond taking responsibility for you" That sounds like all British immigration rules. My employer had to apply for my visa and had to pay all my healthcare contributions for a year up front before I could move for a job in London. If I lose my job I have a few weeks to find a new employer (who will have…

Went to the same visa process recently. It left me with the feeling that foreigners were viewed with suspicion. > I doubt British people know how bizarre the policies that arose from their voting are either. I assumed this actually was a consequence of their voting (seems in line with Brexit).

It hast nothing to do with Brexit, I suggest this is actually a kind of political bigotry.

Here's data showing national attitudes towards migrants [1], the UK has consistently one of, if not the most positive view in Europe towards migrants. It's always been a fairly pluralistic place relative to most places on the continent. The notion of reducing migration or having some control over it is fundamentally different that views of migrants themselves, much like there's a big distinction between regular migrants and undocumented migrants, which is sometimes conveniently ignored for political reasons.

The rules for migrants are varied in every country, they are similar on the Continent in many ways where they have their own bits of weirdness.

The Falkland Islands have a population of 3000, which is really, really small. Every 'small nation' especially the really tiny one's are going to have a really peculiar take on basically everything. There's either one person, or not even one person the kinds of jobs for which we take for granted.

[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/03/14/around-the-wor...

Post reply on HN