Remember when the previous administration suggested looking into the Lab Leak theory and was laughed at? Remember how you would get banned from Facebook for suggesting that the lab leak theory was a possibility? Then major social networks and the medias reversed their positions. What changed in the meantime, other than the president?
WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
21–30 of 220 posts
Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#22>"Ben Embarek told the Danish reporters. In the end, Ben Embarek’s Chinese counterpart eventually agreed to discuss the lab-leak theory in the report “on the condition we didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that hypothesis.” Things would have been so much better, if they had just come correct from the beginning. But now we have all this politicking and censorship and accusations of racism, etc., etc. whe…
I found it sad to see how a very plausible theory (other countries have had leaks in the past) was silenced and censored. As a starter, we need a deep and careful investigation to make sure this doesn't happen ever again either in China or elsewhere.
Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#23Remember when the previous administration suggested looking into the Lab Leak theory and was laughed at? Remember how you would get banned from Facebook for suggesting that the lab leak theory was a possibility? Then major social networks and the medias reversed their positions. What changed in the meantime, other than the president?
It is important to consider the context within which these suggestions were initially put forth. We had a president that claimed to have Coronavirus under control, that it was no worse than the flu and who openly and frequently cast doubt upon the only expert in the room. Perhaps had his behavior been a bit more tempered, he would have been taken more seriously.
It actually wasn't downvoted too much - plenty of people here found it plausible - but the amount of people saying I was stupid and gullible has really stuck with me.
I was told I had no idea how viruses work (this is true enough - I don't have a degree in biology) but still felt extremely gaslit.
Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#24Remember when the previous administration suggested looking into the Lab Leak theory and was laughed at? Remember how you would get banned from Facebook for suggesting that the lab leak theory was a possibility? Then major social networks and the medias reversed their positions. What changed in the meantime, other than the president?
It is important to consider the context within which these suggestions were initially put forth. We had a president that claimed to have Coronavirus under control, that it was no worse than the flu and who openly and frequently cast doubt upon the only expert in the room. Perhaps had his behavior been a bit more tempered, he would have been taken more seriously.
Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#25Remember when the previous administration suggested looking into the Lab Leak theory and was laughed at? Remember how you would get banned from Facebook for suggesting that the lab leak theory was a possibility? Then major social networks and the medias reversed their positions. What changed in the meantime, other than the president?
It is important to consider the context within which these suggestions were initially put forth. We had a president that claimed to have Coronavirus under control, that it was no worse than the flu and who openly and frequently cast doubt upon the only expert in the room. Perhaps had his behavior been a bit more tempered, he would have been taken more seriously.
Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#26Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is important to consider the context within which these suggestions were initially put forth. We had a president that claimed to have Coronavirus under control, that it was no worse than the flu and who openly and frequently cast doubt upon the only expert in the room. Perhaps had his behavior been a bit more tempered, he would have been taken more seriously.
I posted an article on HN at the time from a Chinese-born Harvard Public Health PHd who was writing in winter of 2020 he thought it could have come from the lab. It actually wasn't downvoted too much - plenty of people here found it plausible - but the amount of people saying I was stupid and gullible has really stuck with me. I was told I had no idea how viruses work (this is true enough - I don't have a degree in b…
Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#28Remember when the previous administration suggested looking into the Lab Leak theory and was laughed at? Remember how you would get banned from Facebook for suggesting that the lab leak theory was a possibility? Then major social networks and the medias reversed their positions. What changed in the meantime, other than the president?
We live at the peak of the information age but our natures have not changed. Both left and right need to focus on being unified, not strong-arming the other side.
Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found it sad to see how a very plausible theory (other countries have had leaks in the past) was silenced and censored. As a starter, we need a deep and careful investigation to make sure this doesn't happen ever again either in China or elsewhere.
It got tied to another theory, that the virus was engineered.
That’s the theory they wanted people to consume.
[and apparently voters have short memories because they are disagreeing]
This is indeed interesting to see.
Re: WHO inquiry chief 'had concerns' about lab close to first Covid cases
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don’t shoot the messenger. What about the content? Did the Danish WHO director make the statement or not? BuzzFeed was once declared not a reliable news source.
Sure, ad hominem attack.. but stereotypes exist for a reason. If a story is only in places like National Inquirer, or in this case, if the story is only on a place that is rated as a poor news site, then I'm not going to read it. If it has merit, then it will be republished by more ( non-profit, and independent ) reliable news sources.