Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
21–30 of 1001 posts
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's instead get rid of private air travel. Has caused a pandemic and millions of deaths. And the emissions are very likely larger than those of Bitcoin. People can go on vacation by train instead. If you demand people use slow legacy money then I can demand slow legacy travel, ok? ;)
I see you're getting downvoted but maybe "get rid of" isn't the best approach. Certainly taxing air travel at a chunky rate would reduce unnecessary flights.
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#23What almost alarms me more than the thought of a climate apocalypse is that I don't think this (a UN report) is going to have any effect on the opinions of 40% of the public who see climate change as some kind of job destroying conspiracy.
Nothing short of Florida disappearing under the sea is going to make any difference, perhaps we (as a species) don't deserve to continue.
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#24Getting rid of bitcoin would be a start.
Here's an informed article on bitcoin's energy use [0]. [0]: https://hbr.org/2021/05/how-much-energy-does-bitcoin-actuall...
Honestly, that doesn't seem particularly well-informed. I wonder how this person thinks transactions are committed to the blockchain, and how this is separate from the mining process?
Unless they literally mean "the energy required to consult the ledger of previous transactions", which doesn't seem a useful metric.
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's instead get rid of private air travel. Has caused a pandemic and millions of deaths. And the emissions are very likely larger than those of Bitcoin. People can go on vacation by train instead. If you demand people use slow legacy money then I can demand slow legacy travel, ok? ;)
people on this forum love private jets, but hate bitcoin. why? ppl that travel on private jets can travel commercial, or are some people exempt from climate change damage somehow?
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#26Edit: bad boy
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#27Edit: bad boy
Stupid. Nothing about this is quick. Climate scientists have told us for > 20 years. But sure let's post stupid bullshit on the internet and continue to do nothing.
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#28> This pact aims to keep the rise in global temperatures well below 2C this century and to pursue efforts to keep it under 1.5C. It seems to me that continuing to communicate just the average temperature increase is a missed opportunity to engage with a greater portion of the population. 1.5 or 2 degrees do not seem like much, but once one understands that’s an average made out of much bigger positive and negative sw…
I still know a lot of people who genuinely believe it means slightly warmer summers. They think I'm a crazy person when I mention the never-ending storms and lack of drinking water.
Also just dropping this link here as I remember watching it at the time and thinking isn't it great we're not there yet:
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#29> This pact aims to keep the rise in global temperatures well below 2C this century and to pursue efforts to keep it under 1.5C. It seems to me that continuing to communicate just the average temperature increase is a missed opportunity to engage with a greater portion of the population. 1.5 or 2 degrees do not seem like much, but once one understands that’s an average made out of much bigger positive and negative sw…
Re: Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's instead get rid of private air travel. Has caused a pandemic and millions of deaths. And the emissions are very likely larger than those of Bitcoin. People can go on vacation by train instead. If you demand people use slow legacy money then I can demand slow legacy travel, ok? ;)
I frankly don't think this would make sense. Imagine explaining the people of a country, that they aren't allowed to fly to e.g. Mallorca anymore. The acceptance would be somewhere between low and zero. Maybe private air travel in one country, e.g. from Munich to Berlin could be reduced, but not international flights without any resistance