To be perfectly clear, they are mandating employees be vaccinated if they want to physically go in to an office, not to do (or keep) their jobs.
Exactly -- people are still free to not get vaccinated, but they're not free to go to aggregate settings where they might infect everyone there, which seems like a reasonable compromise. It's the same approach as with antivax parents -- don't want your kids vaccinated? Then you'll need to homeschool them.
Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
11–20 of 722 posts
Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly -- people are still free to not get vaccinated, but they're not free to go to aggregate settings where they might infect everyone there, which seems like a reasonable compromise. It's the same approach as with antivax parents -- don't want your kids vaccinated? Then you'll need to homeschool them.
But if others are already vaccinated, how does an unvaccinated coworker infect a vaccinated coworker?
Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly -- people are still free to not get vaccinated, but they're not free to go to aggregate settings where they might infect everyone there, which seems like a reasonable compromise. It's the same approach as with antivax parents -- don't want your kids vaccinated? Then you'll need to homeschool them.
But if others are already vaccinated, how does an unvaccinated coworker infect a vaccinated coworker?
Not to mention if you don’t enforce the policy, unvaccinated-by-choice persons (henceforth referred to as “morons incapable of basic science and empathy”) will infect one another and further increase the probability of breakthrough cases
Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#14Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#15Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#16oh snap. I totally understand this measure and, for the record, agree with it, but I'm picturing the pushback that this will lead to.
Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly -- people are still free to not get vaccinated, but they're not free to go to aggregate settings where they might infect everyone there, which seems like a reasonable compromise. It's the same approach as with antivax parents -- don't want your kids vaccinated? Then you'll need to homeschool them.
Does this apply to the flu, varicella, meningitis, etc as well?
Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#18To be perfectly clear, they are mandating employees be vaccinated if they want to physically go in to an office, not to do (or keep) their jobs.
I'm getting downvoted but people who refuse to get vaccinated tend to be poor and minorities. And who can blame them for not wanting the government injecting a needle inside their body given the US history?
PS: I'm not antivax by any means, I got my two shots.
Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#19Re: Google and Facebook mandate vaccines for employees at U.S. offices
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
But if others are already vaccinated, how does an unvaccinated coworker infect a vaccinated coworker?
Breakthrough infections and questions about transmissibility even if vaccinated aside, consider this: a second unvaccinated coworker.
And a second unvaccinated coworker is also someone that has chosen not to be vaccinated, right? (Obviously there may be some individuals who can't get the vaccine, but that should be a relatively rare circumstance, and could have policies around dealing with it.)