Live data from Hacker News

Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

aws.amazon.com

31–40 of 155 posts

Re: Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

#31
post #25

Hijaking this to say I hate VPC. I hate VPC. Applying 1990s NATting to next gen cloud service? Gotta give the greybeards something to do. The purpose of NATting is to deal with limited IP addresses, a problem that has been solved for a long time now. AWS makes me create a VPC, but I certainly don't set up some central-point-of-failure NAT or pay AWS to do it.

The fact that we have NATting is why you still have ipv4 addresses at all. Just look at the other thread about ipv6 that's going on in HN right now. Even if a small percent of a population doesn't have an IPv6 address means that no company can use it exclusively yet.

IPv6-only VPC with dual-stack load balancers seems like it would be a great architecture if cloud providers would dot all the i's to make it happen.

https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/deploy360/2014/cas...

https://toreanderson.github.io/2016/02/22/ipv6-only-data-cen...

Re: Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

#32

Holy crap - is this one of the first actual depreciation and get off service things AWS has done? Kind of crazy honestly? They were kind of famous for NOT doing this sort of thing - at all. GCP just announced enterprise API's I see with some (pretty vague) promises about longevity.

You’re generally right but it’s definitely not a hard rule. Amazon/AWS has deprecated and then put to the grave multiple payment services. I made that same comment when SimpleDB was deprecated and someone said the same thing. More recently, torrent support in S3 is being killed off with little notice.

SimpleDB is still supported though. You can still make new SimpleDB domains.

Thats part of what people love about AWS compared to Google Cloud. Google is quick to kill off services it finds no longer convenient for it to run. AWS has historically gone out of its way to keep old services running even as it releases new, better alternatives.

Re: Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re generally right but it’s definitely not a hard rule. Amazon/AWS has deprecated and then put to the grave multiple payment services. I made that same comment when SimpleDB was deprecated and someone said the same thing. More recently, torrent support in S3 is being killed off with little notice.

The thing has been that historically even though Amazon would "depreciate" a service they kept it running and supported. "Amazon SimpleDB (N. Virginia) Service is operating normally" is their current status page, but their marketing materials doesn't show any SDB stuff. So if you had some old workload ticking over - you could just leave it usually. I actually used SimpleDB in a light use case wildly past the point at…

I'm still using SimpleDB in production. I do have plans to migrate that workload, but as long as it keeps working there's really no rush...

Re: Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

#35

As someone who first used AWS in mid-2009 (just a few weeks before VPCs were announced!), but hasn't used an EC2 Classic enabled AWS account now since around 2012, it's hard to remember just how far the service has come. There were only a few instance types, and they were all slow and small (by todays standards). Everyone's EC2 instances were mostly publicly pingable/ssh-able from the internet. EBS was horribly horri…

> This is pretty much the first time I've heard of AWS really deprecating something Amazon has deprecated and then put to the grave multiple payment services. Torrent support in S3 is being killed off with little notice.

S3 torrent support isn't enabled in new regions, but it still works in every region that it was launched in. In other words, AWS goes out of its way to not break its customers applications.

Re: Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

#36
post #31
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fact that we have NATting is why you still have ipv4 addresses at all. Just look at the other thread about ipv6 that's going on in HN right now. Even if a small percent of a population doesn't have an IPv6 address means that no company can use it exclusively yet.

IPv6-only VPC with dual-stack load balancers seems like it would be a great architecture if cloud providers would dot all the i's to make it happen. https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/deploy360/2014/cas... https://toreanderson.github.io/2016/02/22/ipv6-only-data-cen...

But would such a VPC be able to make outgoing connections to IPv4-only servers?

Re: Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

#37
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IPv6-only VPC with dual-stack load balancers seems like it would be a great architecture if cloud providers would dot all the i's to make it happen. https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/deploy360/2014/cas... https://toreanderson.github.io/2016/02/22/ipv6-only-data-cen...

But would such a VPC be able to make outgoing connections to IPv4-only servers?

You could use a NAT64 gateway to do that. At that point you're trading one form of NAT for another so there's less value in going IPv6-only.

Re: Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

#39

As someone who first used AWS in mid-2009 (just a few weeks before VPCs were announced!), but hasn't used an EC2 Classic enabled AWS account now since around 2012, it's hard to remember just how far the service has come. There were only a few instance types, and they were all slow and small (by todays standards). Everyone's EC2 instances were mostly publicly pingable/ssh-able from the internet. EBS was horribly horri…

> This is pretty much the first time I've heard of AWS really deprecating something

Amazon has deprecated several things, they tend not to actually retire them (just reduce thei public profile so people aren't tempted to build new instances, while supporting the existing users indefinitely.)

Re: Amazon EC2-Classic Is Retiring

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re generally right but it’s definitely not a hard rule. Amazon/AWS has deprecated and then put to the grave multiple payment services. I made that same comment when SimpleDB was deprecated and someone said the same thing. More recently, torrent support in S3 is being killed off with little notice.

The thing has been that historically even though Amazon would "depreciate" a service they kept it running and supported. "Amazon SimpleDB (N. Virginia) Service is operating normally" is their current status page, but their marketing materials doesn't show any SDB stuff. So if you had some old workload ticking over - you could just leave it usually. I actually used SimpleDB in a light use case wildly past the point at…

We were SOL when Amazon simple payments was killed off with very short notice and then again with FlexPay.
Post reply on HN