Live data from Hacker News

Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

cyclingnews.com

81–90 of 179 posts

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#81
post #27
post #3

"After Shapira and Plichta were caught by the remainder of the peloton the rest of the riders seemed to believe that they were racing amongst themselves for Gold, unaware that Kiesenhofer was still in front." Not saying she shouldn't had won, but when nobody is pursuing you, it is much easier to win. We have seen in the men race that even when people know there is one person in front, 80% of the riders prefer not to…

No, the rules are pretty simple. The one who manages to first cross the finish line wins. Everybody knows the rules. The problem is it is not a very simple sport and there is some game theory involved. Riding as fast as possible is not the best strategy, actually it is pretty poor one. The better strategy comes from understanding you don't need to win by a lot, winning by 1s is the same as winning by 10 minutes. Also…

Why 5k when it's only a week since Austrian Christoph Strasser set the records for 1000 (one thousand) kilometers, in just under a day (with 2 minutes total for breaks and clothes changes).

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#82
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry but this is ridiculous! Everyone who participates at the olympics must be a professional athlete. Especially, if you are favorite. Observing the environment around you should be obvious?! It is not like Anna Kiesenhofer had the one ring on her finger and was invisible...

Ahhh, no. No! NO! The Olympics as envisioned by Coubertin didn't allow professionals for a very long time, A VERY LONG TIME. For boxers this year is actually the first Olympics that do accept professionals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_Games#Amateurism_and_p...

This sounds rather idealistic and doesn't represent the reality, particularly for this female cycling race! The top competitors of Anna Kiesenhofer had professional contracts!

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#83
post #3

"After Shapira and Plichta were caught by the remainder of the peloton the rest of the riders seemed to believe that they were racing amongst themselves for Gold, unaware that Kiesenhofer was still in front." Not saying she shouldn't had won, but when nobody is pursuing you, it is much easier to win. We have seen in the men race that even when people know there is one person in front, 80% of the riders prefer not to…

The road race at the Olympics is somewhat of an outlier in cycling. It uses national teams as opposed to commerical teams, so riders ride with unfamilar teammates, and in this case the biggest favorites were actually teammates. It also bans radios, so there's no direct communication between the coaches and the riders possible.

Even with radio, the breakouts might feel confident with the lead but not realize yet that the poursuivants have stepped up their speed.

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

She finished over a full minute ahead of second place and at one point had as much as a ten minute lead. She was out of sight for most of the race.

Ok so you want to explain to me that when she was breaking out from the group at the beginning she was invisible?

As you can also read in the linked article, she broke away with some others, as is usual in cycling. After a while the peloton caught up with the breakaways, thinking they're now racing for the lead. But they didn't realise Anna Kiesenhofer wasn't among them, as she is a virtually unknown amateur, so nobody missed her.

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#85
post #73
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh communication is so important, isn't it? There's even an old Slim Gaillard song about that I used to lindy hop to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teaxWYRH9A4 What I've read, Kiesenhofer would have preferred to race the time trial instead of the the road race, she even told that the austrian press just before the race. A breakout gives you the advantage of riding your own pace at our optimal and constant power leve…

It would be a breath of fresh air for Tour de France if they did not use radios. Another outcome could be that we would not see the same rider winning multiple years, simply due to missing radios. All in all seems like a win for viewers.

More time trials, that's what does mix up the Tour de France. I mean who needs a radio on a time trial anyways :-D

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#86
post #81
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, the rules are pretty simple. The one who manages to first cross the finish line wins. Everybody knows the rules. The problem is it is not a very simple sport and there is some game theory involved. Riding as fast as possible is not the best strategy, actually it is pretty poor one. The better strategy comes from understanding you don't need to win by a lot, winning by 1s is the same as winning by 10 minutes. Also…

Why 5k when it's only a week since Austrian Christoph Strasser set the records for 1000 (one thousand) kilometers, in just under a day (with 2 minutes total for breaks and clothes changes).

Because I ran distances from 5k to marathon (with 10k being my favourite) and so I know from my own experience. I have no knowledge of how you run a 1000k run.

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#87
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s also a healthy correction for the nerds-versus-jocks dichotomy which was so common for years. There are a non-trivial number of people who actively questioned someone’s technical competency if they were athletic or assumed that the only way to be a successful academic was to grind everything else out of their life.

My experience is that high-achievers in one area are often high-achievers in other areas as well. For academics as well as athletics, individual ability matters, but the discipline and work-ethic that most high-achievers have translates across fields.

Yes - also simply the circumstances: if you’re in a position to do either well, you probably don’t have serious chronic health problems, family demands, poverty, etc. That doesn’t make it easy but it makes it possible to focus on something more than survival, much as how coming from a financially stable family makes it easier for someone to take a gamble on a startup rather than a safer job at a big company.

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#88
This isn't the first time something like this has happened: cycling aficionados will remember the tale of Robert Millar and the "stolen" 1984 Vuelta [1].

I personally love it when races are run without radios. The UCI tried to ban them in 2010 but the pro teams rebelled, claiming that they were essential for safety reasons; the number of crashes at the 2021 Tour de France would suggest that they aren't succeeding very well at that core function.

Radios make the races formulaic. Not necessarily predictable but certainly a different event. I can't think of any other sport where pros are held to different rules (i.e. allowed technical assistance) compared to amateurs.

[1] https://crankpunk.com/2012/11/09/robert-millar-the-case-of-t...

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#89
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honest question: why would this be interesting in this context? (Edit: check the follow-up comments to see why I wasn't as surprised as others about Ms. Kiesenhofer being both sportswomen and active academic and therefore did not make the connection with Mr. Turing immediately)

It’s super rare to be intellectually gifted and a world-class athlete. There was an NFL offensive lineman with a published mathematical paper as well, but I didn’t know about Turing’s physical talents until now. I don’t know of any other instances of brilliant people being paid or awarded medals for their physical abilities, so I personally found it interesting. I guess the parent comment was for those of us that wer…

There's https://news.mit.edu/2019/student-john-urschel-math-football... .

Re: Anna Kiesenhofer: Mathematician, amateur cyclist, Olympic champion

#90
Don't know where to add it to so I'll add it in response to the OP as some discussion is about it:

Quotation from the Dutch TV (interview with van Vleuten, silver medal winner) [1]:

> "Onderschatting van de tegenstander, in combinatie met heel veel miscommunicatie en ook slechte communicatie vanuit de organisatie."

Which roughly translates to () is mine: "Underestimated the opposition (singular), in combination with lots of miscommunication and bad communication (with the team) from the organization."

Though it looked like she was contend with the performance of Anna Kiesenhofer vs her eventual performance.

[1] Source: https://nos.nl/tokyo2020/artikel/2390838-38-jaar-en-ze-had-m...

Video is country restricted for some stupid reason as it is a interview ... stop whining about rights ...

Post reply on HN