Earlier quoted context omitted.
>...expel or kill virtually all the whites, expropriate their property and destroy all the institutions associated with them. You could have written that about Zimbabwe and it would be just as relevant. There are also a lot of people in SA who are trying to go the same route as fast as they can. I fully understand the anger and resentment these people feel towards ethnic Europeans, but revenge never comes without it'…
Yeah, history shows that revolutions which consist killing or expelling all the educated, well-off citizen typically end up having pretty bad results for everybody. Even if you successfully capture their wealth, the future will be poor when there's nobody competent enough left to manage administration, education, farms, industry, infrastructure and so on. And once things go downhill like that, it's not easy to turn t…
What you're losing when you kill / expel the wealthy (whomever they are) and expropriate / redistribute property is cultural investment in institutions.
In that people may feel the previous system was unjust, but they nevertheless believed in it. That belief (aka trust) takes generations to build.
Revolutions which violently dislocate institutions don't replace them with alternatives: they start from zero.
This has profound growth consequences when, for example, it takes four+ decades for people to trust the legal system again. Or banking. Or anything.