I know this may be silly but one reason why I stay in the "Great lakes states" and own property here is because of global warming and my lack of hope that tech/governments/capitalism will solve it before we reach a point of no return during which we will experience massive property and life loss in the US. Only then significant change will occur IMO. There are places in the south now that need water to be delivered b…
Why do you think that? They are clearly fine with the most expensive option already.
> Coastal areas will be flooded due to increasing sea levels.
No, some coastal areas will have problems with this where the inland has very little elevation gain (e.g. Florida). A house in the South Bay Area alternatively has a lower flood risk than anything near the Great Lakes (just because of the precipitation received on the eastern half of the US).
> Places with little to no rain will experience more extreme fires(happening now).
Some will. It depends on the ecology. Many of these places on fire have fire as part of biological cycle (I.e. the California forests) so if you weren’t ready for that risk you were screwed regardless of climate change.
> I'm sure Midwest will also experience more severe weather but you can make it work, living under water or without water is impossible.
And neither of those things will be feasible outcomes for those of us in the West.
Unless you’re a farmer, living near the Great Lakes for water security is pretty stupid. You have a higher chance of being killed by a tornado or a lightning strike than there being a water shortage that makes the west unlivable.
Israel desalinates ocean water and a fuckload of people still live there.