i'm shocked how ignorant these lawmakers are, trying to gain control over a decentralised structure nobody asked them for this and even if this change ends up in bitcoin's core, it will ultimately fail to reach consensus our wallets are none of your business, EU, get out!
>nobody asked them for this I very much support the policy. Anonymous money pretty much serves one thing uniquely well which is avoiding the law, sanctions, laundering money, buying drugs or funding crime and I don't think any society has interest in having these markets exist outside of the purview of the state.
EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
161–170 of 402 posts
Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#162I’m amazed by how short sighted most of the comments here are. When it comes to large financial operations, society has clearly chosen transparency over privacy. Cause guess what, tax evasion, money laundering, political fixing, terrorism financing are things that exist and really are hurtful to our economies. Stop fantasizing that the government cares about the shit you buy. This is not about you. And Bitcoin’s anon…
That said, you're probably right in the long run. Cash is already less convenient, and it's only a matter of time until it's gone. The "transparency" argument will win, for the arguments you've outlined: "tax evasion, money laundering, political fixing, terrorism financing" and anything the government can prosecute under those descriptions. And to add to the list, non-accredited investors having a flutter, people spreading disinformation, people we don't like etc.
Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#163I’m amazed by how short sighted most of the comments here are. When it comes to large financial operations, society has clearly chosen transparency over privacy. Cause guess what, tax evasion, money laundering, political fixing, terrorism financing are things that exist and really are hurtful to our economies. Stop fantasizing that the government cares about the shit you buy. This is not about you. And Bitcoin’s anon…
The gov do care about what you buy.
Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#164I’m amazed by how short sighted most of the comments here are. When it comes to large financial operations, society has clearly chosen transparency over privacy. Cause guess what, tax evasion, money laundering, political fixing, terrorism financing are things that exist and really are hurtful to our economies. Stop fantasizing that the government cares about the shit you buy. This is not about you. And Bitcoin’s anon…
Society can vote with its wallet.
Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, you can't see anything, basically. You can only see your own wallet and transactions, and (AFAIK) you can't even see who sent you funds.
So, then how does that technically work? How will integrity be verified/guaranteed? If it's just an application level shielding, as in a separation between user software that can't access the information but a layer/cluster of infrastructure software that can, then I'm not so sure if its nothing more than rather meaningless cosmetics. Do you by any change have some references as to how this would work? because I sinc…
Confidential transactions combined with bulletproofs [0] are an efficient way to deal with the added privacy.
You cannot see who sent you the amount. Blockchain is fully encrypted and you cannot see any amounts or transaction sender/receiver.
Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#166Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#167I’m amazed by how short sighted most of the comments here are. When it comes to large financial operations, society has clearly chosen transparency over privacy. Cause guess what, tax evasion, money laundering, political fixing, terrorism financing are things that exist and really are hurtful to our economies. Stop fantasizing that the government cares about the shit you buy. This is not about you. And Bitcoin’s anon…
I would argue with "society has clearly chosen" statement. The governments are putting more and more strict regulations in place for last decades and they often don't care what the society thinks about those. There used to be a time not long ago when one could show up in bank with a bunch of cash and it would be of no issue. I don't think that terrorism was less important back then.
Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not right - pretty much all modern wallet software generates brand new key pairs each time there is a transaction, thereby creating a new address. The unspent utxo's (unspent transaction outputs) are then sent to the new address and the old address can (but shouldn't) be used.
But anyone can see the new address to which the utxo's were sent...
Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#169Re: EU plans to make Bitcoin transfers more traceable
#170I’m amazed by how short sighted most of the comments here are. When it comes to large financial operations, society has clearly chosen transparency over privacy. Cause guess what, tax evasion, money laundering, political fixing, terrorism financing are things that exist and really are hurtful to our economies. Stop fantasizing that the government cares about the shit you buy. This is not about you. And Bitcoin’s anon…
If society chose transparency over privacy by implanting listening devices in every individual, would that be acceptable?
To every person who downloads random phone apps and gives them mic permissions, who has Siri or Alexa listening all the time, or who has a Nest doorbell recording their street... probably?