Live data from Hacker News

Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

thedrive.com

391–400 of 564 posts

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#391
post #3

A bit of a stretch to classify this under right to repair.. if you rent a car from tesla, it’s going to be up to tesla to choose how it’s repaired. And it doesn’t seem unreasonable that they won’t accept a hack fix (however safe it may be) - that car is going to be sold to someone once the lease expires, they just can’t take the risk I would read this as a cautionary tale against renting your cars. If you can’t buy i…

Mate, your talking about a brass nipple being threaded into a broken plastic part to replace a plastic reducer that was [probably] poorly ultrasonic welded in place. What I see in the article is a common sense repair. Anyone who turns a wrench is laughing at the Tesla fanboy pearl clutching over this. Not an attack on your post btw, just a general statement that every Tesla owner comes out of the cracks in these post…

On the contrary the biggest critics of the car’s QA problems are the people driving them. It’s the people who don’t own them who say dumb shit.

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#393

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why the assumption that the independant tesla repair people don't know this? It might be unknown to you but I assume that people who work with metals and liquids all day long (including coolant) would have some idea of their interaction.

The point is not to call them incompetent - there absolutely are rigorous and good third party repair shops out there. Unfortunately, there are just as much of them just trying to get your money and then fixing it the simplest and cheapest way possible, without the consideration for long term safety and secondary effects that Tesla has probably put in. As an outsider, it's hard to tell the difference, but I agree wit…

> without the consideration for long term safety and secondary effects that Tesla has probably put in.

This seems like an incredibly wild assumption. The German concept of 'keine ehrfurcht fur deine maschine' will keep you from seeing every problem as a chance for your box to shine.

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#394

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I bet they do have comprehensive insurance, but their insurance company told them that this is a collision loss. Just read my policy, which is written by a very large insurer -- and this would, in fact, be a collision loss under mine.

They didn't have comprehensive insurance but Tesla didn't verify it's mentioned in the video.

[deleted]

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with the pearl clutching part. Unless Tesla can state exactly how this fix is inferior to it's original design. Putting a brass nipple in a plastic pipe is a tried and tested process. The stated pressure is 2 psi, or max 5 psi during testing. 5 psi is about 3.5 meters of water column. So the pressure is equivalent to what you get in your home. The piping is essentially house plumbing level stuff.

They should also have to state how much the repair would cost if done at the factory where they can actually service the battery pack. Imagine if other cars were like that: "Sorry, we're not able to service engines so instead of replacing your timing belt for $400 you have to buy a new engine for $6000"

Yes, this is the correct analogy. TSLA is unable to do a reasonable repair so they should bear the extra cost

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#396
post #359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anecdotal. But I haven't spent $5k in repairs to my 17 year old bmw in the 10 years I've owned it. I do budget for $1k a year though.

You are in the bmw sweet spot I think. Newer ones have even more complex and expensive parts but reliability isn’t better and access is difficult

But they've been saying that as long as I've been buying used BMWs (20 years). It's just a way of conveniently saying "you'll be wrong in the future".

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#397
post #328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> A customer should be free to pick out an experienced and competent repair-shop just the way they currently do for their cars. And if they don't want to, they can take it to the dealership like they would have anyway. I would agree, as long as that third party has insurance in the event their fix (due to work performed on the high voltage battery pack) causes a failure resulting in the loss of the vehicle and liabil…

Hold on for a minute. I dearly hope Tesla battery packs have enough smarts in them that shuts charging down when overheating. There must be fifty ways to set your battery pack on fire...

> There must be fifty ways to set your battery pack on fire...

Just slip out the pack, Jack Plug it into a new toy, Roy Hook it up to the wrong bus, Gus Don't need to discuss much!

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#398

When a company like Apple says that only their app store can run on iPhones, HN crowd usually sides with Apple, with the justification that "It is a free market. People can buy another phone if they don't like it." Why doesn't the same principle apply here? If your car company does not offer the right to repair, then buy another car. What is the difference? Both are instances of big companies gating access to their d…

Without arguing whether your premise is even correct, the difference is that in this crowd, people know Apple's walled garden exists. Perhaps the fact that you never "own" a Tesla is less set-in of a fact.

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#399
post #360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, although I think it is about an order of magnitude less of a problem than that. My house runs at 60psi, +/-3psi, and I think it is pretty bog-standard for US plumbing. It's about 11m from the basement to the attic, and still needs decent pressure upstairs, so, yes, 2-5 psi is silly low pressure to worry about - it's only going to be a slow leak even while running, the only problem is if it runs out, for which I…

Wow, 60 psi? Thats like 40 meters of head. So you must be using booster pumps to get the pressure. Never knew this. In India, 99.99% of all homes have gravity flow and static pressure, so except for very tall buildings, no one gets pressure more than 5 - 10 psi.

40m doesn't seem at all surprising if you consider the height of a water tower built somewhere with higher elevation than most of the town. My house is 20m lower than the base of either of the two nearest water towers, at least one of which is ~75m tall. A few years ago, the town completed migrating one of the outlying areas with lots of new development into their central pressure zone, resulting in an increase by 45psi in those neighborhoods.

Pressure reducing valves are used anywhere the pressure going into a home is above 80 PSI, and those are a lot more common than homes needing their own booster pumps.

Re: Tesla’s $16k Quote for a $700 Fix Is Why Right to Repair Matters

#400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I bet they do have comprehensive insurance, but their insurance company told them that this is a collision loss. Just read my policy, which is written by a very large insurer -- and this would, in fact, be a collision loss under mine.

They didn't have comprehensive insurance but Tesla didn't verify it's mentioned in the video.

Collision with an object in the road should be a collision claim anywhere in the US that I’m aware of. Maybe he’s confusing the two.
Post reply on HN