EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
131–140 of 265 posts
Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Private jets are completely irrelevant to global warming because there are not enough of them. They’re a convenient distraction from the problem that actually curbing global warming will require huge changes in the lifestyle of the global middle class. Not just the super-rich.
> Private jets are completely irrelevant to global warming because there are not enough of them. They probably are irrelevant, so why exempt them? > actually curbing global warming will require huge changes in the lifestyle of the global middle class. Not just the super-rich. I'm of the impression that "middle class lifestyle" itself isn't a big contributor to global warming but rather the manufacture and supply chai…
Because not exempting them may make it harder to pass the bill?
Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#133Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#134The EU has been completely bonkers for the last few years. Just staggeringly stupid policy I mean look at them literally banning encryption and then this I'm confused but the ppl running the eu are more confused
The EU (especially the Eurozone) was designed when neoliberal paradigm was in fashion (1980s-1990s). That's why currently its core institutions are less democratic than they should be.
Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#135Turkey will love this - as they are not an EU member and have just built the biggest airport in the World.
Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Private jets are completely irrelevant to global warming because there are not enough of them. They probably are irrelevant, so why exempt them? > actually curbing global warming will require huge changes in the lifestyle of the global middle class. Not just the super-rich. I'm of the impression that "middle class lifestyle" itself isn't a big contributor to global warming but rather the manufacture and supply chai…
> They probably are irrelevant, so why exempt them? Because not exempting them may make it harder to pass the bill?
Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Private jets are completely irrelevant to global warming because there are not enough of them. They’re a convenient distraction from the problem that actually curbing global warming will require huge changes in the lifestyle of the global middle class. Not just the super-rich.
> curbing global warming will require huge changes in the lifestyle of the global middle class. Except it won't. It will cause some large industries to cease to exist though.
Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Me dumping a bunch of tyres into a nearby river would be absolutely negligible compared to global pollution, yes it's still not allowed. A single private jet flight is incredibly polluting yet we allow it to be exempt from pollution tax because......on a grand scale it's nothing? Hmmmmmmm.
All of your points are valid. I guess I struggle with the hypocrisy around that fact that if we really want to curb CO2, there is a bigger fish to fry. For example, millions of people travel for pleasure on airplanes. From one point to the otherside of the globe. No one gives a damn about that, but hey! Look, rich people on fancy airplanes. Even just today, GitHub copilot Twitter thread was full of “Rich people (Micr…
Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#139Re: EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that every country deserves a fair opportunity to grow with cheap energy. We took advantage of it, and in the process we created huge externalities. We should clean after our mess first and then try to lecture the developing countries.
By that exact same logic, the next generation of people in every country should be allowed to use as much polluting energy as the last one, because the established generation did so and they are the developing generation.
Obviously though, you can't have both. The difference here is that rich countries are rich, and can afford to take on the extra financial burden via the very same finances that they obtained via cheap energy.