The basic idea is that bets are collateralized at a level of 150% of the starting price. If you buy a synthetic stock when it's at 100, and it goes above 150, your bet is cashed out at that point. As usual, the big question is, what's the collateral? In this case it's their very own private stablecoin, Terra, which pays an annual percentage rate of 17%. That, in turn, is being paid by people who are borrowing that st…
Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
201–210 of 361 posts
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#202Fake seems like a strange choice of words here. These things arent attempting to deceive anyone into believing they are the real thing. They clearly label themselves as derivatives. We don't call corn futures fake corn, we don't call derivatives of other types fake those things and we shouldn't call these fake stocks. I'm really not defending or not defending whatever these platforms are. I wouldn't be surprised if t…
> We don't call corn futures fake corn /ZC is physically settled[0], so that’s not a great example. /ES (S&P 500) or other index futures that are cash-settled is a better analogy. They’re also, yknow, regulated[1]. [0] https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/oilseeds/corn.c... [1] https://www.cftc.gov/
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like the rest of the blockchain?
So stocks are randomly awarded to miners? Like any stock or each stock is its own chain? The stocks are not backed in any other way?
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#204> Users can trade the tokens anonymously 24 hours a day, seven days a week, from anywhere, unhindered by capital controls, “know your client” rules imposed on broker-dealers, and other frictions of the traditional financial system. I find it really weird how crypto folks keep pretending that financial regulation is an obviously bad thing, as opposed to restrictions put in place in response to real problems
Isn't it also weird that crypto enthusiasts assume that you obviously can't trust a central clearing house (or similar mechanism) when they have been working well for hundreds of years? In numerous cases humans trust institutions for certain things, and those institutions are usually strongly incentivized to act honorably, and do so. And when they don't, the court system works pretty well. At least in the countries w…
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#205Even Mark Cuban fell for something similar with great production value.
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
Things like BTC swaps don't really have settlement periods: every so and so numbers of often (often 1 or 8), longs pay shorts using some premium formula is swap > index, and vice verse if swap I suppose you could construe that as some periodic partial settlement mechanism, though.
Is it not that settlement nominally occurs when you choose to exit your position? Which raises various questions about whether whatever stack of turtles your swap is built on can provide liquidity when you need it.
Of course, the amount of liquidity and spread available will depend on how popular the coin or specific contract is.
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#207> But to stop mirrored stocks and other synthetic assets from trading, you would have to shut down the underlying open-source software code that makes up the blockchain and is used by a global user base that includes many anonymous players, he added. Don't these synthetic assets need an oracle to inject the price of the real assets into the blockchain? To stop these synthetic assets from working, couldn't they just g…
Hard to keep the price of Apple stock a secret
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#208How does this make sense? If they don't hold the underlying security, where does the value come from? This feel like it's another one of those "while money is flowing in it'll work, but if there's a run, it crashes spectacularly". If the liquidity dries up, i end up owning nothing. With a real security at least i end up owning a small part of apple, but here i literally own nothing.
How do they get price to track the real stock? By simple incentives. If the synthetic stock is trading lower than the real price, people have incentive to buy it. If it is trading above, people can easily mint new stock and sell it.
There are lots of benefits to this: 1. It allows people who typically might not have access to the US market to get price exposure to US companies
2. It allows 24/7 trading
3. US stocks are just the start, before more innovative synthetic products can be built on top.
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn't about Mark Cuban's losses per se, I also have no issue with him (an accredited investor) getting bilked for some change between the couch cushions - the issue is even if an incredibly sophisticated investor like Mark could fall for such a rug-pull/failure then how can we possibly expect unsophisticated investors not to get bamboozled? Remember, those who wash out of trading end up beneficiaries of the stat…
That is exactly why no one should be trading cryptocurrency. Anyone who does so deserves to lose everything. I don't want the SEC wasting my tax money protecting those idiots.
Re: Fake Tesla, Apple stocks have started trading on blockchains
#210I think this is illegal. This is effectively a CFD, which are absolutely illegal in the US regulated or not. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_for_difference
Does this mean that Archegos and all its counterparties were not permitted to trade CFDs?