Earlier quoted context omitted.
> any claim to be male, female, non-binary or whatever must be accepted at face value. And that the person who is making the claim should have the right to any treatment that they wish, up to and including surgery. I can understand some caution around the latter part of this quote, given how traumatic, invasive, and costly surgery can be. It is a defensible and reasonable position that there should be _some_ barrier-…
But how can anyone _possibly_ deny the first part? How could anyone contradict an individual who states their own gender - on what grounds can you claim to know how someone feels about themselves better than they themself do? How do you define denying the first part? According to my child's world view, I need to ask them every day what their pronouns are today. And any accidental slip-ups on any adult's part are a de…
A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
691–700 of 1001 posts
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#692Namely, the practice of protesting a respected lecturer whose ideas you disagree with, and pressuring the administration to support your position with a formal denunciation so strong it starts looking libelous against the lecturer, damaging their career and sometimes their personal lives.
Sooner or later, this is bound to backfire legally, so the administration has to be worried about it becoming widespread. It also changes the power dynamic in the university, making administrators defer to students out of intimidation, and probably creating a lot of enmity in the process. Until convinced otherwise, I'm viewing this as an example of the administration trying to reassert itself, and this particular gender ideology case just happens to be the proxy battle for that.
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#693Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The situation for college students, at least a certain segment, is that people with the transgender identity are far more common than they once were. That's the base reality, not the product of any ideology. And whatever it's point of origin, this reality for these isn't going to change. A significant number of people who identity as trans later return to their original gender identity. This is known as "detransitio…
A significant number of people who identity as trans later return to their original gender identity. Whatever the percentage of people who chose to do this, that situation doesn't actually change my point - that significant number of trans people exist and their situation is quite threatened. And the way that you (and other) think that this is a "counter argument" is something of a demonstration that people making th…
You have misunderstood my point. It was directed specifically at this statement:
>And whatever it's point of origin, this reality for these isn't going to change.
For some, but not all, trans people this reality does change. They exist, and they also deserve empathy and support.
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#694Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really an apt comparison since there's nothing about a nickname that defies observable reality, a name is a social construct to begin with. Sex however is a biological construct in which the characteristics are directly and quantitatively observable.
Sure there is. My legal name and the name I sign on documents is "Michael" but I could have a preference for "Mike". Are you really going to deny that to me because there is an "observable reality" that is different from my preference?
I have a friend who was named at birth after their absentee parent and really dislikes ever being called by that name. It is important and polite to use names that people personally prefer within reason.
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#695Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if you insist on calling that person by the wrong name even though you know it's not what they prefer? That seems like a pretty good example of creating a toxic work environment and you should be fired over it.
It would depend on the specifics. There is a difference between harassing someone and not deferring to their request on the basis that you don't agree with it (however misguided you may be). Conflating these two things is precisely why there's a backlash against CRT et al. from otherwise left-leaning individuals.
You're hitting the nail in the head that the problem is with the anti-trans person making a stink about it. That is where the real burden is, and that is who is to blame for the toxic work environment. The bully is the problem, not their target.
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#696I think the irony of the current battle around identity is that we have been making steady progress based on the idea that personal characteristics shouldn't matter. However this whole debate is reversing that by not only saying it matters a great deal but that other people should be forced to defer to others personal choices even when it directly affects them
Do you feel the same way about nicknames? If you call someone by a nickname that they don't like and they let you know they prefer their own name then do you consider it too onerous to defer to them about it?
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#697Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Interestingly enough, there's not much animosity toward trans-men. These ground exclusively concern themselves with trans-women. I second this. Maybe it's some echo chamber effect or a minority stirring shit up, but I've hardly heard anything over the years about transmen-as-men vs men-as-men. It seems like most of the focus is on transwomen-as-women vs women-as-women. Maybe we're not as vocal? Maybe we care less? I…
TERFs primarily don't focus on trans men because they see them as misguided women. You can find many TERFs blaming trans women and "gender ideology" for convincing butch-identified lesbians that they're actually straight men. Personally I think this denies trans men the dignity and autonomy to define themselves as they see fit, but then again, I would say that, I'm trans.
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#698Earlier quoted context omitted.
This was ironically one of the things that was hardest about coming out as gay, for me. Nobody ever treated me the same way again. I was either uncomfortably praised or silently judged, with practically no in-between. Suffice to say, my sexuality is on a need-to-know basis, now.
And the reverse: your sexuality - or anybody else's who is not my mate - is not on my list of 'want-to-know'. I simply do not care about the choices and/or attributes of other people though I believe they should be 100% free to make whatever choice they want and be whoever they are, and have gone out of my way to ensure that this is the case for people who find their life's choices frustrated or their reality denied…
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#699Can someone please tell me how important this topic based on the amount of news time and eyeballs it attracts relative to the number of people that it affects? The numbers I can find for US citizens is: 0.6% or 1,988,696 out 331,449,281 of people total for the entirety of the US in 2021. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_Unite... In the UK where the featured article took place the latest poll I…
I think there will be rather a lot of us who are quite animated by this issue—one that doesn’t directly affect us—because of our own past experiences. As a gay man growing up in the 90s, I very acutely remember some of the public discourse around gay rights while I was a teenager. In the UK, that specifically included a coordinated campaign against mentions of homosexuality in education, with some pretty stark attemp…
Re: A backlash against gender ideology is starting in universities
#700Earlier quoted context omitted.
We're happy to take off rate limits if people give us some reason to believe that they sincerely intend to follow the site guidelines in the future.
Ok I promise. My last topics I posted on were about this, a security blog post, the news, Simone Biles and accents. I do actually talk about lots of topics on HN but I tend to get drawn into political discussions which are replied to a lot more. Also it's hard for me not to respond when someone calls me a bigot, etc. I'm definitely not on HN just to troll about politics. I really think it's unfair to say I'm on HN to…
> I really think it's unfair to say I'm on HN to "battle" anyone. I don't think my comments here have been particularly confrontational?
When I skim through your recent comments I'm mostly seeing posts like these (just a random sample) - these are examples of what we don't want on HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27606026
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27506628
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27506572
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27423188
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27379700
If you don't like the words "political/ideological battle" or "flamewar" we can find a different description; the point is that this is not the curiosity-driven, respectful conversation that the site is supposed to be for.