Live data from Hacker News

Remote workers work longer, not more efficiently

economist.com

41–50 of 109 posts

Re: Remote workers work longer, not more efficiently

#41
The big quality of life thing I received from the Pandemic is that instead of procrastinating, I simply take a nap. No bullshitting. I know the elite companies have nap chambers, but WFH provided this for me - a regular ass joe the plumber developer.

No commute, rest when stressed by a problem, a deep dark secret that’s helped me just do the work or sleep. The simple rest has solved entire features for me. The humanity of it all is remarkable, but of course, a dirty little secret in this absurd world.

I’m human - come at me bro.

Edit: To deny the stress of the alarm clock, the commute, the theatrics of looking busy, like, I just can’t. We’re mentally healthier and I will absolutely not put up the bullshitters that say it isn’t true.

Re: Remote workers work longer, not more efficiently

#44

You have to count the time in traffic in the efficiency calculation.

From the employee's point of view, yes. From the company's side, not really. Which may explain to some degree why workers are more likely to feel that they're more efficient working from home - they consider the commute part of the workday, and the employer doesn't.

Re: Remote workers work longer, not more efficiently

#45
post #12

Does the original study attempt to account for the once-a-century pandemic occurring at the same time? Seems like one should be careful drawing conclusions about remote work from the last year's data.

This was probably the best environment for remote work. There was nothing else to do but work and eat for many. As people start going to sports games, vacation, concerts, fairs, dinning, bars, clubs, etc. the number of hours they’ll work will go down.

> There was nothing else to do but work and eat for many.

Though it's entirely possible that hurts efficiency.

> the number of hours they’ll work will go down

and it's possible that can improve efficiency.

Re: Remote workers work longer, not more efficiently

#49
The economist article is primarily based on this study: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3846680

> In order to better understand this decline in productivity, we examined data on employee time use from the analytics software. During WFH, employees spent more time engaged in various types of formal and informal meetings, especially video conferences. As a consequence they were able to spend substantially less time working without interruption. They also spent less time networking (both within the firm and with clients), and less time receiving coaching or 1:1 meetings with supervisors.These findings suggest that increased coordination costs during WFH at least partially explain the drop in productivity

Let's looks at this: More time in conferences - maybe but if one is looking closely there is a lot people get done in conferences when not watched - stuff in their household, talking a walk or real other work. Networking being measured as time with boss is ridiculous. The remote working setup in fact allows one to network fairly efficiently and the network structure changes. Instead of getting information from the boss one may now just get a pointer from the boss and gets the information from the horses mouth in a 1:1 call.

Interruptions in a shared/open floor plan office can not be silenced easily. Now one can just go offline and get things done - provided the company is sane and does not mechanically measure productivity.

And on the other hand one can indicate to be reachable while doing one's homework - allows for a small break and is a win/win for both sides but will blow up time logged into the system.

> In this paper we provide an analysis of the effects of the switch from WFO to WFH in a largeAsian IT services company.

Ok, let's parse this. There is "a" == "one" company and then it is Asian which covers a lot of countries but quite a number of them have a long working hour mindset. Not the best basis to extrapolate...

> The data also include information on hours worked, our primary input measure. This is measured in a sophisticated way, as the analytics software takes into account whether an employee actually engages in a relevant task (which counts as work time) or merely procrastinates at their desk (not counted), by monitoring which software tools the employee uses.

Right. The problem is that my coffee machine and my shower are not wired up to be monitored and a lot of great work has been done there.

Re: Remote workers work longer, not more efficiently

#50

Why is this presented as a problem? If one works 1-2 hours more daily and still gets more personal/family time, for eliminating of unproductive commuting time, is this not good? is this not in fact more efficient?

You don't though. The article addresses that:

"Although they saved commuting time, this did not offset the extra hours spent in meetings."

Post reply on HN