Earlier quoted context omitted.
When I setup a small online business, that was one of the first things I did. It doesn't cost much at all, and was very easy.
In my experience, a "real" address is needed somewhere. PO Boxes are fine for many things, but for process service, etc. the part of your state government that is responsible for business entities will want a real address.
Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
41–50 of 85 posts
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you've never heard of competitive addressing, then. Instead of PO BOX 1234, Anytown, ST USA you use Street Address of Post Office, Unit # PO BOX Number, Anytown ST USA. In addition to giving you a "real" street address, it works for any services unable to otherwise deliver to a PO BOX like UPS, Fedex or DHL, because as long as they deliver during business hours, the post office will sign for your package. I use th…
the USPS consistently has the highest favorability rating of any government agency, at 91%: https://federalnewsnetwork.com/agency-oversight/2021/04/usps...
I recall efforts to reduce stress as apparently managers were tired of being murdered.
Maybe new phrase will be “Going Amazon”
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t expect consumers to track down fake Ball lids and Apple chargers. I expect Ball and Apple to do that.
In civilized countries you have consumer watchdogs that deal with fraud and unsafe products so the consumer doesn't have to. The point of the law isn't to catch criminals, it's to prevent crime.
And Amazon is complicit in this just as much as Aliexpress and all the other platforms that are enabling product spam coming from China.
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least in California they are liable in tort: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/another-court-gets-hove... > California’s Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District) determined that Amazon could be held strictly liable for injuries a consumer suffered from a defective hoverboard she bought from the retailer, even though Amazon neither manufactured nor sold the product. > The plaintiff in this latest case, Kisha…
So Wal Mart is liable for defective products in California too?
[1] And the first jurisdiction globally, I think.
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
In my experience, a "real" address is needed somewhere. PO Boxes are fine for many things, but for process service, etc. the part of your state government that is responsible for business entities will want a real address.
So you've never heard of competitive addressing, then. Instead of PO BOX 1234, Anytown, ST USA you use Street Address of Post Office, Unit # PO BOX Number, Anytown ST USA. In addition to giving you a "real" street address, it works for any services unable to otherwise deliver to a PO BOX like UPS, Fedex or DHL, because as long as they deliver during business hours, the post office will sign for your package. I use th…
It’s probably one of those things that starts as a feature and quickly morphs into a really, really big bug.
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
I feel like the offloaded liability is just a technicality and is a poor lack of incentive for Amazon to do anything. Sure, the product was sold by a non-Amazon third party, but from the user perspective the defective product was purchased on Amazon. The company can deflect blame to the marketplace sellers all they want, but it's still Amazon's reputation that receives the most lasting damage.
I am wondering if Amazon is immune to reputational damage though. People have been complaining about counterfeit and defective products from Amazon for about 5 years now, and it doesn't seem to have had significant effect on market share. I've been disentangling my purchasing habits from Amazon, but I don't know too many other people who are.
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you've never heard of competitive addressing, then. Instead of PO BOX 1234, Anytown, ST USA you use Street Address of Post Office, Unit # PO BOX Number, Anytown ST USA. In addition to giving you a "real" street address, it works for any services unable to otherwise deliver to a PO BOX like UPS, Fedex or DHL, because as long as they deliver during business hours, the post office will sign for your package. I use th…
The only reason people on HN have hate for the post office is they are influenced by capitalists who want another industry to “disrupt.” American oligarchs have been declaring war on public services since the New Deal, and over time American workers have sadly been propagandized to buy into it. As a result, the U.S. Post Office is not what it used to be (it used to offer banking services!!!) but it’s still one of the…
The USPS does an absolutely terrible job, by objective measure. Many of their locations are significantly understaffed, with 30-60 minute waits for basic services (for paying customers!). Rude, unhelpful employees are the norm.
Why should package and letter delivery be a public service? Their approach is not working.
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
In my experience, a "real" address is needed somewhere. PO Boxes are fine for many things, but for process service, etc. the part of your state government that is responsible for business entities will want a real address.
So you've never heard of competitive addressing, then. Instead of PO BOX 1234, Anytown, ST USA you use Street Address of Post Office, Unit # PO BOX Number, Anytown ST USA. In addition to giving you a "real" street address, it works for any services unable to otherwise deliver to a PO BOX like UPS, Fedex or DHL, because as long as they deliver during business hours, the post office will sign for your package. I use th…
For a long time, the USPS would simply refuse to accept deliveries from competitors, which always struck me as the utmost in anticompetitive, non-interoperable-by-design bullshit. I'm glad to hear they have stopped.
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
So Wal Mart is liable for defective products in California too?
Yes, ever since the 1960s, actually. In fact, California was the first state[1] to adopt strict product liability. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_liability#Landmark_leg... Most U.S. states and many other countries have since adopted California's regime. So California courts extending their common law strict product liability doctrine to encompass Amazon's marketplace is quite a noteworthy precedent. [1] An…
Re: Legislation would unmask third-party sellers, but Amazon is fighting it
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
the USPS consistently has the highest favorability rating of any government agency, at 91%: https://federalnewsnetwork.com/agency-oversight/2021/04/usps...
Impressive. Grew up when “Going postal” was a popular expression due to how often postal workers went on shooting rampages. I recall efforts to reduce stress as apparently managers were tired of being murdered. Maybe new phrase will be “Going Amazon”
Veterans with PTSD and weapons training sometimes flip out and shoot people.