Live data from Hacker News

Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

nltimes.nl

131–140 of 211 posts

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#131
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fiat is backed by weapons. The same weapons that defend your house from other countries and force you to give up half your salary. My main criticism to cryptocurrencies is that they're mostly unbacked. The ones that are backed by Fiat have similar problems to Fiat currency (why would I need that?), the ones that are backed by physical assets are much more interesting - but they don't seem to be the mainstream ones, p…

> Fiat is backed by weapons. What does this mean? It's the currency of a country that has weapons. If someone steals my USD, will US use their weapons to get it back for me? If the value of their currency drops substantially, will they go to war with some unknown power that's causing this drop and reverse the change? Countries also change currencies, often during times of inflation. This is an effectively meaningless…

The argument is that every year the us government will demand you pay a certain amount in USD (taxes). If you fail to comply men with guns (the police) will arrest you and put you in prison.

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#132
post #84

> "Cryptocurrencies are essentially neither money nor a financial product, but an example of what Nobel laureate Robert Shiller calls a 'contagious narrative': a contagious story in which people believe because other people believe in it." Which is exactly what money is, to begin with.

Like the stop sign bubble. Those stop signs dont actually stop cars, they just work because of the contagious narrative

I actually HATE crypto discussions on HN, and clicked on this link before thinking -- and wow this is a great comment. It is very deep! I'm very glad I clicked. Well done.

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#133
post #34
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Maybe a tiny minority Wait, what? That’s like the main reason people give when pumping it - “Bitcoin will replace fiat and it’s a good hedge against normal money.”

For quite a while the prevailing sentiment has been that bitcoin is a store of value and more akin to gold not dollars. At any rate, there's plenty of crypto with much different aims.

Only by people with no understanding of economics.

The demand for Gold is primarily functional and is generally larger that the speculative demand. This puts a floor on on its value.

Cryptocurrency is almost pure speculation and thus has no floor to its value.

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#134
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

well, there's also the force of law behind stop signs.

A contagious narrative backed by guns indicates weakness of narrative

To the contrary: It must be a pretty strong narrative if it convinces people to commit violence.

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#135
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the parent is talking about chartalism ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartalism ), which is essentially the idea that fiat currencies derive their value from the fact that taxes must be paid in them. A sort of "just so" story about this would go something like (with much credit to David Graeber): "Way back when, some Assyrian king got the great idea to, instead of giving their soldiers food and drink, give…

I think the value of a currency comes from the creditworthiness of the country issuing it. If someone nuked the USA and burn down the entire USA army and economy, the dollar wouldn't have much value. The USA army protects the states. Switzerland, as per parent's post, has defense agreements with other countries. The likelihood of Switzerland being attacked or destroyed is also very low. What would the international c…

> If I started my own country in the middle of the ocean and started issuing my own currency it would be worthless.

Not necessarily, if you were using it within your own country, the use case for most currencies. A fiat currency is little more than a promissory note or IOU (think about how I could go to a bank and exchange my dollar for a dollar's worth of gold during the gold-backed fiat period). In fact, less than 200 years ago many banks were able to issue their own currencies as promissory notes in many US states and were valid, but only with those banks.

The idea of an all-powerful national currency that bans all others is relatively new from a global perspective and even today, there are parts of the world where small communities have and still do issue their own local currencies in order to facilitate local trade.

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#136
post #84

> "Cryptocurrencies are essentially neither money nor a financial product, but an example of what Nobel laureate Robert Shiller calls a 'contagious narrative': a contagious story in which people believe because other people believe in it." Which is exactly what money is, to begin with.

Physical money has value because we have an economy. If you have a USD, you can come to the US and spend that dollar. Bitcoin doesn't have an economy, it is literally a meme. The only thing you can do with it is trade it for real money.

The value of USD is based on the US economy. The value of Bitcoin is based on people's perception of the value of Bitcoin.

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#137
post #84

> "Cryptocurrencies are essentially neither money nor a financial product, but an example of what Nobel laureate Robert Shiller calls a 'contagious narrative': a contagious story in which people believe because other people believe in it." Which is exactly what money is, to begin with.

That tax bill I get every year payable only in dollars isn't imaginary.

[deleted]

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#138
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Fiat is backed by weapons. What does this mean? It's the currency of a country that has weapons. If someone steals my USD, will US use their weapons to get it back for me? If the value of their currency drops substantially, will they go to war with some unknown power that's causing this drop and reverse the change? Countries also change currencies, often during times of inflation. This is an effectively meaningless…

> If the value of their currency drops substantially, will they go to war with some unknown power that's causing this drop and reverse the change? They might - that’s essentially what the U.S. has done (or, at least, did for a while) when other nations tried to break the petrodollar system.

Good point, but this isn't really a good thing :-/

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like the stop sign bubble. Those stop signs dont actually stop cars, they just work because of the contagious narrative

This is so deep I can't tell if you're joking or not. There are rural towns that have a completely different concept for a stop sign... backed by a lack of enforcement from officers.

Don’t try to stop completely at each stop sign, that’s impossible.

Instead, only try to realize the truth... there are no stop signs.

Re: Netherlands must ban cryptocurrencies immediately: CPB head

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The argument used in the article is "citing fraud, criminal use, and financial instability"

Fiat currency of course never being used in those. Cryptocurrencies are an object of value due to scarcity alone. In that sense, it is no different from various rare materials. The difference with fiat is that governments mandate that it be legal tender, that al who do business must accept it but I am left to wonder, what if I were to open a store and accept bitcoins and euros, as I must operating in an area where eu…

You are not actually required to accept legal tender for anything besides debts. If the transaction is simultaneous, you are not required to accept legal tender (at least in the US.) This is why stores don't have to accept cash and be card only.

Edit: I am speaking about the US, unsure how this generalizes everywhere.

Post reply on HN