Live data from Hacker News

Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

arstechnica.com

181–190 of 219 posts

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ever traveled outside of your own countries a lot of airports have facial recognition entry/exiting ports that will scan your face and your passport.

this is a textbook false equivalence. Travelling hinges on the ability to verify your identity. Using a piece of software does not and must not require sensitive documents like a passport.

What about travelling has identity verification built in? It’s just an arbitrary rule in both examples.

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#182
post #174
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't consider OEM bundles malware, a practice that goes all the way back the early days of home computing. https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/games/james-bond-007-action-... http://www.bambi-amiga.co.uk/amigahistory/bundles.html

So malware magically ceases to be malware as soon as it’s preinstalled by the vendor?

It wasn't malware to start it.

> computer software that is designed to damage the way a computer works

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/malware

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#183
post #162
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't consider OEM bundles malware, a practice that goes all the way back the early days of home computing. https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/games/james-bond-007-action-... http://www.bambi-amiga.co.uk/amigahistory/bundles.html

Congrats on reverting home computing back to the amiga days then. I have walked into target, bought androids, pulled them out of the box and connected them to the network over which they would immediately proceed to download gigabytes of malware from the play store.

That is not malware.

> computer software that is designed to damage the way a computer works

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/malware

As home computing being reverted back to the Amiga days, I really look forward to it.

PC, macOS, iOS, Android are devices with a soul, where hardware and software is designed in alongside each other.

Whereas GNU/Linux folks keep trying to put a PDP-11 sh into a mobile phone.

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#184
post #168
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed, https://www.google.com/chromebook/chrome-os/

Ok, well now I can't do most of the stuff I was doing on GNU/Linux without doing it on a machine that someone else is hosting. So that's still a step backward.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aide.ui&hl...

Want a GNU/Linux phone? Buy Openmoko, or any other commercial failures that followed them.

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#185
post #172
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is definitely better than default GNU/Linux installations.

What? Point me to a single piece of malware in any major distro's repositories; I'll wait.

Software most humans care to use on GNU/Linux isn't part of distro repositories.

curl | sudo sh rulez!

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ever traveled outside of your own countries a lot of airports have facial recognition entry/exiting ports that will scan your face and your passport.

this is a textbook false equivalence. Travelling hinges on the ability to verify your identity. Using a piece of software does not and must not require sensitive documents like a passport.

  Travelling hinges on the ability to verify your identity
What a strange world we live in since the 80's

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#187
post #79
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really love my pinephone, but frankly, what doesn’t lag on it?

Hackernews, dino, FVWM, and vim don't.

If I don't take it slow and give my Pinephone (Community edition with 3 gig of RAM) time to think, I've seen hckrnews crash Firefox on my Pinephone.

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Human knowledge stand on the giant shoulders of others and patent and copyright with ever-greening and useless litigation are making it hard and difficult. Can't fathom someone can copyright a rectangle drawing and sue phone companies for launching rectangle phones. How is this even an argument, given that patents expire?

> How is this even an argument, given that patents expire? These days, many patented technologies expire faster than patents on them. In those cases, patents are quite literally halting progress.

Wait, are you saying that because technological progress is too fast, technological progress is slow?

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#189
post #147
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Technically, “was” is wrong because the new Nest Hub doesn’t run any part of Android. These are Flutter apps targeted specifically for Fuschia. There’s no evidence yet that they will run Android on top of Fuschia.

They are actually working on porting the Android Runtime (ART) to Fuchsia. [1] [1] https://android.googlesource.com/device/google/fuchsia/

Thanks for the link.

Re: Huawei replaces Android with HarmonyOS, which is also Android

#190
post #94

Fascinating to see how much is 'inspired' by Apple's design and Microsoft's for the document app. I'd feel dirty in so blatantly copying someone else's design, but Huawei doesn't share those concerns. Maybe for good reason.

The problem is that, in general, when a company doesn't respect intellectual property laws or obviously makes use of industrial espionage (and I'm not suggesting either is true for Huawei) they are sending a clear signal that laws do not apply to them. So as a customer why would I trust any company with my most personal health, banking or own intellectual property if that company sees no reasonable limitations to its…

IP laws is a fiction. If the US authorities want to enforce rules like "you can't paint your car green because the green color has been patented" they can, but I see no reason why other countries would adopt this nonsense. Besides, countries aren't governed by laws, they only have treaties and agreement between each other that they can enter and leave voluntarily.
Post reply on HN