Live data from Hacker News

Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

reuters.com

781–790 of 844 posts

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#781

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I truly cannot relate. All one needs is a VPN, a torrent client, a browser and an internet connection. Most tv's nowadays are smart enough to either connect to a simple Windows share or at least be able to play movie files. My SO and I watch a new movie almost every single night with a very simple setup and rarely encounter problems. It reads to me like you've over engineered movie night and are now complaining about…

> All one needs is a VPN You don't need that. At least, I don't. > a torrent client All good operating systems (i.e. Linux) come with one. Though obviously most non-technical people don't use Linux. > a browser Pretty much standard on everything. > an internet connection Which they would be using anyway for streaming services. > Most tv's nowadays are smart enough Aaagh! Don't use "smart" TVs!

> Aaagh! Don't use "smart" TVs!

This response is the perfect example exactly what the OP was talking about.

Smart TVs are great. Click a button, see the show you want.

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#782

This makes it very likely that the beloved Stargate franchise will return as an Amazon Prime exclusive franchise, which will be great news for those of us like myself with appetite for 60+ more seasons of that show (after the 17 seasons that have already been made). I watched the sci-fi show "The Expanse" on Amazon Prime Video. Season 4 (the one made by Amazon Prime Video) felt like it had a tenth of the budget compa…

> Season 4 (the one made by Amazon Prime Video) felt like it had a tenth of the budget compared to season 1 and 2. A completely different show that I found very boring and unwatchable. Season 4 follows book 4, whereas previous seasons split the books in a non-typical fashion: e.g., S02E05 ("Home") was the end of book 1. Book 4 is also part of the second kind-of-trilogy and so is a bit slower paced, because it set ups…

I’ve read all the books and S4 was my favorite so far as it didn’t look as cheesy (the first few seasons have that “syfy” tint to them, which is strange considering they have the same budget) but S5 was not good, imo, which sucks because it’s probably my second favorite book. Too much filler it really should have been 8 episodes tops.

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#783

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I truly cannot relate. All one needs is a VPN, a torrent client, a browser and an internet connection. Most tv's nowadays are smart enough to either connect to a simple Windows share or at least be able to play movie files. My SO and I watch a new movie almost every single night with a very simple setup and rarely encounter problems. It reads to me like you've over engineered movie night and are now complaining about…

Three comments so far that highlight the exact point the parent was making, a true lack of empathy. VPN alone is enough complexity for most... it's hard to find one that doesn't have comments calling it potentially insecure, questioning the owner, nevermind keeping tabs on if it sells to another owner.

You can use a seedbox and then download via sftp. The seedbox is exposed and the service takes the piracy notices.

This eliminates exposing your IP from torrents and the file being downloaded.

For a site like HN, I'm really surprised at this discussion.

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#784

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> All one needs is a VPN You don't need that. At least, I don't. > a torrent client All good operating systems (i.e. Linux) come with one. Though obviously most non-technical people don't use Linux. > a browser Pretty much standard on everything. > an internet connection Which they would be using anyway for streaming services. > Most tv's nowadays are smart enough Aaagh! Don't use "smart" TVs!

You do need a VPN to mask your IP. Especially if you're going to be using public trackers. Otherwise you'll get copyright notices and you're ISP could terminate your service.

Get a seedbox and download the files over sftp from it. All your ISP will see is a large transfer, no file names or knowledge of content.

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#785

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The show was weird from the start -- the first season was the first half of the first book, then they adapted the second half of the first book and the first half of the second book for season two (and likewise for S3 and books 2 & 3). Season 4 largely resolved that by wrapping up book 3 and adapting all of book 4 in one go, since book 4 is kinda slow on its own.

The show is weird because the source material is kind of schlocky and the show improves it significantly. I think season 4 is so hard to watch because book 4 is a self-contained story so they couldn’t blend characters and scenarios like in the previous book. The book characters are all a little too one-dimensional and the show does an excellent job condensing them into well-rounded characters. I had to stop reading h…

This. I’ve read them all but my god is the writing terrible, or at least half of it. It’s written by two guys one who is a big sci-fi fan/writer who writes all the good characters (Bobby, Avasarala to name two of my favorites.) But the other guy, Daniel Abrahams, is a horrible writer imo and his shit writing bleeds through. I’ll also add that they can’t really write women and it seems like it’s written by two male nerds who didn’t engage with many women before meeting their wives (which is why they write women best when there’s no relationships involved.)

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#786
post #665

I wish people didn't watch so much television. It's too good and too easy to watch an unlimited amount of content. Every hour you spend being entertained in front of your screens is an hour less you could be spending building actual social bonds with people in your community. There is a correlation to increasing tv watching and decreased social club engagement. By social clubs I mean bowling clubs, skating clubs, 4H…

I have some pretty bad internet addiction too. It was so bad I basically stopped playing guitar in my teen years. I restarted last year and had to basically start from scratch, it was so depressing. I used to be able to sight read sheet music, then I threw a budding life skill all away to look at memes I will never remember or play some dumb quest in a game. I was addicted really to consumption. I stopped creating. N…

It sounds like there's hope for you, especially since you are now aware of what you wish to mindfully pursue.

I'd suggest that you not beat yourself up over the past, and always, always keep in mind the Creative Gap:

https://www.brainpickings.org/2012/02/22/ira-glass-on-the-se...

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#787
post #467

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jesus, if the show significantly improves on the books in that regard then I can't imagine what the books are like. I'm mid-way through S2 of the show right now. I like the realistic portrayal of what space travel/interplanetary colonies might look like. All the political stuff. But some of the dialogue and characterization is still embarrassingly cliched.

I don't know. People keep complaining about Cibola Burn (book 4), but I liked it . I genuinely consider it one of the better ones. That's perhaps because it's the first, and to date the most detailed, exploration of the aliens and their technology, which to me is the most interesting part (after Earth-Mars politics). But then, I'm the weird guy who thinks character development is overrated, and reads sci-fi for the i…

The whole series is like a tease. I like book 4 a lot too because I started reading this series to read about alien monstrosities, etc. Then the next three books turn back into a political theatre and it only gets good again in book 8 when they start looking at different alien systems. The series should have been a lot less books, but it makes sense the writers themselves have said they have the whole story in mind, up to the last sentence, and they’re just adding in pacing. I think it’d be better to have a trilogy with the first two books, the second two and then the last trilogy (no need for books 4&5 since, as I said, I’m wanting to read about an ancient alien civilization.)

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#788

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it makes you feel better the fourth book of The Expanse is the most boring in my opinion and the show stuck to the plot for the most part throughout. I still enjoyed both the book and the fourth season but the action and production really picks back up in the fifth season. EDIT: VAGUE REFERENCES TO SPOILERS BELOW

Seeing Laconia with serious CGI budget is going to be amazing.

The budget hasn’t changed, and it’s ending at book 6 we aren’t going to get to see Laconia in all its glory on screen.

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#789

This makes it very likely that the beloved Stargate franchise will return as an Amazon Prime exclusive franchise, which will be great news for those of us like myself with appetite for 60+ more seasons of that show (after the 17 seasons that have already been made). I watched the sci-fi show "The Expanse" on Amazon Prime Video. Season 4 (the one made by Amazon Prime Video) felt like it had a tenth of the budget compa…

Season 4 is bad because the book is bad. Unfortunately, the source material doesn’t get any better after this.

It does at book 8

Re: Amazon acquires MGM for $8.5B

#790
post #634

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love how the term "break up big tech" includes "break" in it. Kind of makes you realize what's really at stake here. Sure, you don't want monopolies, but is breaking US companies going to actually prevent monopolies, or are you just shifting the balance of power from US companies to Chinese companies? Because you sure as hell are not going to break those up - and Tik Tok has demonstrated what should be obvious: we…

This is such a cowardly view. > or are you just shifting the balance of power from US companies to Chinese companies? That's not going to happen. The biggest Chinese companies only exist because of stolen technology. This is a well documented fact. Tencent for example has this business model: 1) Identify trending games from competitors outside of China 2) Clone those games and release them internationally 3) Petition…

> The biggest Chinese companies only exist because of stolen technology.

We can debate the origination of their know how just like we can debate the origination of Covid. But at the end of the day what matters are the results, and China demonstrated with Covid how much more successfully they were in execution than we were. That same scenario is being replayed in board rooms across the globe - the Chinese people are hungrier, work harder, and get results more quickly. Granted, there are still gaps in some areas, but the margins are shrinking every day.

> Maybe in the short term they'll see some growth, but in the long-term innovation will always prevail.

You are somehow implying that the Chinese people are fundamentally bad at innovation. That's neighboring on being a racist statement that you should take a moment to reflect on. Just like innovation is not limited to the Bay Area, it's not limited to the US either. The Bay Area did in fact produce a disproportional amount of breakthrough ideas in the past 50 years, but not because their residents are somehow genetically more superior to other parts of the country (and ironically, you might be surprised to find out just how many Chinese workers stand behind so many of those Bay Area companies). It happened because the infrastructure for ideas was there (lack of enforcement of non competes, high risk tolerance of financial backers, previous waves of successful founders sharing their know-how with young founders and pouring money into new startups, etc). The pandemic has removed the need for in-person meetings for fundraising, and suddenly we're seeing an even more pronounced decentralization of the Bay Area, which should prove that innovation is not tied by city, county, or country borders - it's tied by regulatory, educational, and financial constraints, all of which are rapidly improving in China.

Once this current wave of Chinese mega-successful companies cashes out, the next wave will be even stronger. It's only a matter of time until a suitable ecosystem forms in China that will give their people the right ingredients to kick our ass in innovation, on top of all the other things they are already kicking our ass in.

Post reply on HN