I wish something is done about these rentiers. Someone I know is amassing a rental property portfolio, while I am struggling to buy my first home. I am not against people making money and getting rich, but it would be nice if it wasn’t so easy to buy up multiple properties simply because they have the cash.
There should be all kinds of incentives for first time home buyers. But it should be made very expensive/very painful from second home onwards. I don’t care that I can’t afford a luxury car or overpay for Google stock. But it annoys me to no end that the so called “investors” (not just rental companies but small time landlords too) buy properties with the sole aim of jacking up the rent and pushing first time buyers out.
Housing is not a luxury, it is a basic human need. People can own a hundred Ferraris for all I care, but there should be some sane policy on letting individuals and companies own entire neighborhoods and blocks.
Along the same lines, Bill Gates owns 242,000 acres of farm land. What for? I don’t know. It is just plain ugly to let someone own huge lands, water supplies (there are companies buying up large water sources) etc. This amount of monopoly on basic human needs is just bad.
I know this is an unpopular opinion here, as many HN readers see real estate as a way to get rich and likely own rental properties themselves. But across the world, in many urban areas, there is severe housing shortage (artificial in most cases, and houses sit empty because “investors”, see Canadian cities for example).
On top of all this, most cities and towns have extremely unfriendly policies towards tiny houses. That is whole another level of unfairness.