I can’t help but feel Google’s only consistency is in their trying to be clean, cool, and innovative, but not actually getting the details right, and ending up looking juvenile and Fisher-Price-like. On mobile, the font is too big and too ragged. The colors and shapes look like a Kleenex box aesthetic. The spacing isn’t all that great. I’m absolutely puzzled why a behemoth like Google can’t have exceptional, human de…
I suspect it’s structural, and that Apple has a lot more levels of internal design critique — in everything top to bottom. Google seems more loosely linked and in most things seems like the left hand doesn’t know what the right is doing.
Material You – The next stage for Material Design
41–50 of 155 posts
Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#42Seems like this will be an unpopular opinion, but I like the design. How appealing a design is is personal preference, and I think a lot of the elements advertised, say, squiggly sliders, show the flexibility of the system; it's not like all sliders will be squiggly, but it opens up the possibility while still working with the rest of the design language. The emphasis on customization is important as well - a more fl…
Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#43Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#44I can’t help but feel Google’s only consistency is in their trying to be clean, cool, and innovative, but not actually getting the details right, and ending up looking juvenile and Fisher-Price-like. On mobile, the font is too big and too ragged. The colors and shapes look like a Kleenex box aesthetic. The spacing isn’t all that great. I’m absolutely puzzled why a behemoth like Google can’t have exceptional, human de…
Apple is still slowly recovering from its iOS7 moment, so not a great example.
Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#45Have we officially hit peak Corporate Memphis? https://www.wired.co.uk/article/corporate-memphis-design-tec...
> “Isometric perspective is interesting, because nothing recedes to a vanishing point,” Rudnick says, “and therefore it also eliminates the variable of time.” He points out that this type of design is particularly popular with fintech and mortgage companies – playing down the passage of time is particularly advantageous to firms selling financial products that you may end up paying off for years. What the fuck do van…
For a mortgage company, you don't have a ton of flexibility with your rates— there's a little wiggle room but for the most part your rates will be correlated with the Federal Reserve's interest rates. However, you can control the distance, which lets you alter the logo's perception of time.
Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suspect it’s structural, and that Apple has a lot more levels of internal design critique — in everything top to bottom. Google seems more loosely linked and in most things seems like the left hand doesn’t know what the right is doing.
Naturally, otherwise how to justify PWA vs ChromeOS vs Fuchsia vs Flutter vs JetPack Compose.
Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#47Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#48A lot of corporate bull without any tangible result.
Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#49No web implementation for date pickers? come on, man.
Re: Material You – The next stage for Material Design
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Naturally, otherwise how to justify PWA vs ChromeOS vs Fuchsia vs Flutter vs JetPack Compose.
You just listed 5 unrelated teams that have nothing in common. What's you point?
Lets see which one of them wins out the Google political wars on the long term of Google Attention Span (TM).