@dang, > All: this thread got a flash flood of angry-predictable-obvious comments. Please don't post those! They're really bad for this site. The issue with such points isn't that they're wrong, it's that they're not interesting. Nothing predictable and obvious is. We want interesting conversation here, and that comes from curiosity. If you're feeling agitation rather than curiosity, please wait until that polarity f…
> What "flash flood of angry-predictable-obvious comments" are you talking about? They're collapsed at the bottom of the page now. Before that, they were the page. Downweighting low-quality generic subthreads is one of the key things moderators do here to try to improve the quality of the threads—which unfortunately tends to go to the lowest common denominator by default. p.s. "@dang" is a no-op. I only saw your ques…
Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
171–180 of 301 posts
Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#172The problem with this governmental intervention is that you can't have it both ways. These companies want the governmetn to step in to hlp them with their problems, but let's take a look - are they going to contribute back once the government has intervened? What are they really proposing, a 20% revenue tax on consumer products that are sold with these new US sourced chips? No. Of course not. God forbid they actually…
Just to play devil's advocate, what would the world look like had there been massive investment 5-10 years ago? The benefits would probably have been a chip shortage that wasn't and we'd be free to complain about other things.
If it was started 5-10 years ago, would it have survived the change of administrations?
Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#173Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#174IBM use to manufacture PowerPC chips in New York and Vermont. They may still, but I'm not sure.
AFAIK the Vermont plant is owned by GlobalFoundries and is still operational.
I'm not sure what's changed since then.
It may work for GF, but it's not enough for national security interests - critical parts of the supply chain depend on a potentially hostile foreign power (and it's not just silicon).
I'd say the US should invest in TSMC, and push to expand manufacturing capabilities to domesticate some production - but good luck convincing taxpayer's that that's a good idea.
Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#175Well, TSMC had 2020 revenue in the 30 giga-$ range. Even a few 3% sales tax on that revenue would pay for a 5 giga-$ investment in 5 years. (or a few F-35's / year) That's grossly optimistic numbers, given US labor costs, startup costs, etc, but it's also potentially a reasonable investment that would be sustained by domestic and international purchases (one would hope).
TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation) is a foreign company that operates entirely overseas - why would the US have authority to tax them? If anything I'd imagine they'd be against this proposal.
Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#176Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#177To all those saying that those companies can afford it themselves, remember that there are reasons they don't. The economics don't add up. Companies tend to do what is in their economic interest to do. Something like this can change the economics, which could be a good thing.
This sounds a lot like "God moves in mysterious ways and has a plan for everyone, everything happens for a reason". No actual analysis and reasoning required.
This free market religion is what gave us 2008 and will keep giving.
Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#178Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#179Globalization is inevitable , resistance is futile, in 300y we will have the world finally united and democrat with some due exception
Re: Tech giants join call for funding U.S. chip production
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
There have been calls for some time to treat semiconductor manufacturing as in the interest of national security. The funding and policy isn't onerous to do so, and "never let a crisis go to waste." Something similar was already done for rare earths [1]. [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=rare+earth+us+national+secur...
That's not an incorrect way of thinking! If we need it to be effective for self-defense and existence, it probably needs to be protected as such.