Live data from Hacker News

Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

css.umich.edu

411–420 of 794 posts

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#411

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My impression was (again! uninformed!) that pasture-raised cattle basically are living off whatever plants naturally grow on the land. Is that not the case? Of course it is wrong for factory farmed cattle raised in a shed, and for grain fed to cattle right before slaughter to change their meat, but I thought the bulk of their diet was basically unmanaged wild grasses?

That was, indeed, how cattle used to be raised back in the day, with maybe some grain added to their diet to make up for seasonality of plants (after all, cow eating is a year-round business). Nowadays, most cattle lives confined in a pen, being fed grass and grains depending on the stage of growth. There’s still some very small farmers using the traditional methodology, but the vast majority of the meat you can buy…

Not where I am, it's mostly just pasture raised cows, there time in a feedlot is very short.

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#412

Most of the ranch land in my area isn't really suitable for other kinds of agriculture so I don't know if that measure means much. It certainly isn't irrigated and I think the cows give back the water they use.

Depends of the volume. Cows don't just drink, eat, and return lovely fertilizer. The huge amount of urine and manure some cow ranches produce is dangerous to the environment around them, and to the ranchers, so their waste actually needs to be removed and processed.

They kind of actually do. The ranchlands nearby my area haven't really changed since they were settled. Windmills and roads are the major change since the 1800's.

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think danShumway answered 1) pretty well. I just wanted to add my opinion about 2). Nothing an individual does in terms of personal behavior can have any "significant impact" at a global scale. If all humans made decisions like this, we would all come to the same conclusion, none of our individual actions are responsible. Which, while true, is ultimately a useless conclusion. I'd rather that we as a collective chan…

This is another classic example of Tragedy of the Commons [1]. Outright bans will likely never be feasible at all, though we could (and should) consider banning many of the bad practices that usually come with large-scale factory farming (and publicly funding grants/subsidies for these plant-based alternatives). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons

I prefer the equivalent but opposite legislation, remove meat and dairy subsidies. I don’t have faith in governments to constantly fine tune subsidies to the right things. Subsidies just become a means for politicians to pass money to their constituents. It took Canada 60 years to stop emphasizing cow milk consumption in their dietary guide, I have very little faith in governments to get things right let alone in a quick iterative fashion.

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#414

Most of the ranch land in my area isn't really suitable for other kinds of agriculture so I don't know if that measure means much. It certainly isn't irrigated and I think the cows give back the water they use.

IIRC someone was working on a seaweed-based feed additive to cut down on the methane production, not sure what came of it.

Yeah read that too but seriously? You going to spend the energy harvesting and transporting that to the center of the country so cows fart a little less? Meanwhile China still puking out a third of the world's CO2 with no end in sight.

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#415
post #170

I'm generally surprised no one brings up the negative health benefits of processed foods. It is not healthier to get rid of meat only to replace it with high salt chemically processed food that tastes like meat. It seems like we are going backwards. You know what uses less greenhouse emissions, less water and less land? The orginal plant based food that gets processed into a beyond burger. If you really care about th…

Couldn't agree more. It's highly proceeded fake food.

I think you could do better by simply eating more veggies and cutting red meat consumption.

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#416
post #303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I feel you. I stopped eating meat for 40 years for the same reason. But... they are on the same food chain we are, and they’d eat us in a heartbeat, right? Herbivorous ruminants like cows would never eat you, and would generally never harm you unless provoked. Breeding intelligent lifeforms in a bespoke way to murder them for cash — whatever the reason or creature involved — is diabolically evil. If you do this for…

Well... look up things like “cow eating chicken” or “deer eating bird” on YouTube. Not saying it’s common, but “never” is perhaps too strong a word. And of course I really meant it in a larger sense, not the direct ruminant/person relationship.

Those are exceptions, should not change view based on that. No animal can harm humans like we do others.

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#417

While it is not my experience at all, I understand that some folks have certain negative opinions of Beyond Burgers, and other fake meat/imitation burgers: - The texture is off - Maybe they cook strangely - Potentially less taste But the most important thing about them, and the reason I urge everyone to at least _try_ Beyond Burgers, is they require no violence against animals. This is not an argument that fairs well…

I guess the difference would be though, that without the demand for meat, those cows would likely never have lived at all. 99%+ of all cows alive are used for human agriculture. From the perspective of any living creature, I generally think of existence as a positive good versus non-existence. I know I certainly would rather come to a violent death at a young age than have never been born at all. I think there's a pl…

Do you view the millions of existences prevented by contraception the same way? Those humans also don’t exist for entirely preventable reasons …

This seems like an on its face absurd and pointless argument to me. In these scenarios we are basically talking about unborn hypothetical future cows and from that perspective your argument makes no sense at all.

Cattle would obviously continue to exist in some form, even with a greatly diminished population – so we are not even talking about extinction.

Is the fact that compared to 100 years ago the US horse population shrank by 50% (due to reduced demand) a great tragedy? Obviously not. Obviously.

This argument is so weirdly absurd.

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#418
post #340

I am an avid meat-lover but it does play on my conscience that I am in fact eating a former sentient being and potentially contributing to environmental devastation. I would appreciate answers to the following two, albeit simplistic questions that always plaque me when I consider stopping eating meat products: 1) Is it really unethical to eat animals when the natural trajectory of most animals lives was likely to be…

One counterpoint against 1), and what eventually pushed me to stop eating meat, is the supposed humane slaughtering of the animals. It is not humane at all, and there is a lot of malpractice against the animals while they are in the slaughterhouse. There was a broadcast on Dutch television highlighting these issues. If your stomach can handle it; here is the link, but I warn it is very expressive: https://www.youtube…

> I warn it is very expressive > ~3m23 the actual footage

Pigs are stunned, hanged by their back legs and have their throats cut. What's the problem?

If this is inhumane, how should humane slaughtering look like according to you?

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I feel you. I stopped eating meat for 40 years for the same reason. But... they are on the same food chain we are, and they’d eat us in a heartbeat, right? Herbivorous ruminants like cows would never eat you, and would generally never harm you unless provoked. Breeding intelligent lifeforms in a bespoke way to murder them for cash — whatever the reason or creature involved — is diabolically evil. If you do this for…

I absolutely respect your choices and your opinion, but I don't understand them. Is the wolf diabolically evil? No cash involved of course. Is that the issue? What if I hunt the animal and kill it and then consume it, like the lion, the tiger, the hawk, and the dolphin? Is the hunter morally superior to the farmer who raises a steer, providing clean water, well grassed pasture, and then kills in a humane manner for p…

> Is the wolf diabolically evil? ... What if I hunt the animal and kill it and then consume it, like the lion, the tiger, the hawk, and the dolphin?

As much as I respect the intelligence of those animals, what a remarkably low bar to measure ourselves against. May as well justify manslaughter and rape as while we're at it. Drawing a line that arbitrarily suits certain primal desires and justifying it by pointing at animals is how we move backward, not forward.

Re: Beyond Meat’s Beyond Burger life cycle assessment (2018)

#420

That's good and all but the taste is still far off from normal. Impossible is a lot better but still not an exact fit.

Well shit, the taste is slightly off so let's keep killing billions of sentient animals.

I never understand this argument. Yes, taste matters, over and above any other factor. If it didn't, we wouldn't continue to kill so many animals.
Post reply on HN