11–20 of 55 posts
Can they actually go after any of these entities? Seems like at this point it's pretty trivial to set up a website which proxies manifest files and injects DRM keys directly... Good luck, but I'd assume these folks are all in non extradition countries, or have covered their tracks pretty well...
The lawsuit will allow them to search further.
For a whole 30 seconds of fight action?
For a whole 30 seconds of fight action?
Don't people have a right to their property?
Question to anyone that understands the legal 'play' here: is it the thing to say that it cost them 2,000,000 paying (I assume) streams, which feels ridiculously high? And then it gets bargained down or something? Because it seems a lot like the "you pirated my album/film instead of buying it" - whereas the reality of it is probably more like a high percentage just wouldn't have bothered - a passing interest/opportun…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't people have a right to their property?
I feel like this is a rhetorical question, but I’m not very confident that they should when it comes to data. It’s definitely less clear cut than physical ownership in my opinion. Abstractly it seems wrong to limit people from certain bit arrangements without paying. The source is limitless.
The person copying clearly values that arrangement, or they wouldn't be copying it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't people have a right to their property?
I feel like this is a rhetorical question, but I’m not very confident that they should when it comes to data. It’s definitely less clear cut than physical ownership in my opinion. Abstractly it seems wrong to limit people from certain bit arrangements without paying. The source is limitless.
I invite you to apply this logic to your personal data.
For a whole 30 seconds of fight action?