Live data from Hacker News

Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

pastebin.com

91–100 of 103 posts

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#91
post #78
post #71

What Interests me is, who capped all the logs. In a room with four ops and 4 non ops, unless it was server admin?

What about snagging someone's log files?

The person's name was [RADACATED] out when talked to or about. The mentioned the person as very quiet but that was good for collecting INTEL, which prolly means they were doing counter INTEL.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#93
post #65

There are some odd problems with this document: 1) The timeline in the beginning is incorrect. #11 shows Laurelai was part of the HBGary attack. Yet in the #hq logs, Sabu had no idea who Laurelai was (and raged on him/her pretty hard). 2) Kayla is the only member that the A Team does not dox. However, the Laurelai/NA conversation contains a reference to the Xyrix = Kayla idea (which is referenced in many other places…

Yeah FYI sabu and topiary hate me, and im pretty sure Aaron Barr is behind this nonsense, oh and the logs of me are made up, i think ill sue Mr. Barr.

Never spoken to a lawyer I take it. Free legal advice: stop typing. An hour ago. "I think I'll sue" = I've never consulted legal counsel.

If I were you I would be laying low instead of registering on every site discussing you and writing stuff like this. Specifically to HN we don't really care about intra-kiddie drama and if you are genuinely considering legal action you've already screwed your case in a lot of ways.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#94

Reading the Laurelai/NA cap about the FBI raid made me wonder if anyone ever tries to reverse-bug the FBI by hiding bugs in HDDs and other equipment prone to seizure...

In the first 10 minutes of forensics class, they start stressing that you never work on original equipment -- always from copies.

So a "bug" in a HDD would just hear all of the fascinating conversation that takes place in an evidence locker.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#96
post #91
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about snagging someone's log files?

The person's name was [RADACATED] out when talked to or about. The mentioned the person as very quiet but that was good for collecting INTEL, which prolly means they were doing counter INTEL.

[deleted]

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They aren't proof, but they might be enough (I am not a lawyer) for a search warrant for email addresses, person's homes, and phone/ISP records of the people named in the "d0x."

Most importantly, if a random group posting to pastebin can find them, the FBI has got to be able to, too.

The FBI is not good at finding [good] computer hackers. They have to outsource or bring somebody in who actually knows what the hell they're doing. And those people are not necessarily very good at it.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#99
post #11

Hmm * mentions HBGary a lot * focuses on people who have been previously associated with the HBGary hack * shows special disdain for kayla and sabu & seems to be personally offended * likes to link people to their social networking profiles * only non-skiddie name mentioned is Barr's * obviously works (worked?) in infosec * previously in the military? (ALPHA MIKE FOXTROT = Adios Mother Fuckers) Gee, I wonder who the…

Wonder if the spelling mistakes are strategically placed then. Or does Mr. Barr really spell that way. He's like a 40+ year old married guy.

>>...so your invincable.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#100
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Totally agree with you there, it's all going to depend on what's found in the houses. If they find evidence in the houses it's all going down. A friend of mine a long time ago back in the 90s beat one of these things because they didn't have a warrant. Cops came to his parents place while he was out. Parent's let them in, they found a bunch of telco manuals, seized the computers, everything in the room was inadmissib…

Why did that make the evidence inadmissible? Was it because it wasn't their room any more, and therefore the FBI didn't have a right to be there?

[deleted]
Post reply on HN