What Interests me is, who capped all the logs. In a room with four ops and 4 non ops, unless it was server admin?
Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
71–80 of 103 posts
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Barr? No way, they have been snitchin on each other and in wars when Ryan took over the anon IRC. Then he D0x'd people, then they him, I am supprised he did not go into hiding months ago.
Created: 22 minutes ago. Posted: 19 minutes ago. Welcome to HN, Mr. Barr. :P
Thank you for having me.
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#73I am currently imagining the icy thrill running down their spines if these guys fingered them properly...
I would be microwaving my hard drives, flash drives, the cat (in case it talks under pressure), dying my hair and, I was going to say become a cross dresser but it looks like a few of them are already.
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#74Reading the Laurelai/NA cap about the FBI raid made me wonder if anyone ever tries to reverse-bug the FBI by hiding bugs in HDDs and other equipment prone to seizure...
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
They aren't proof, but they might be enough (I am not a lawyer) for a search warrant for email addresses, person's homes, and phone/ISP records of the people named in the "d0x."
Totally agree with you there, it's all going to depend on what's found in the houses. If they find evidence in the houses it's all going down. A friend of mine a long time ago back in the 90s beat one of these things because they didn't have a warrant. Cops came to his parents place while he was out. Parent's let them in, they found a bunch of telco manuals, seized the computers, everything in the room was inadmissib…
Why did that make the evidence inadmissible? Was it because it wasn't their room any more, and therefore the FBI didn't have a right to be there?
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#76Didn't the kid have a spell checker or did he just want to sound l33t?
Usually I'm not a grammar nazi (english isn't my first language so I understand the curse of engrish) but this is just annoying to read.
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#77yeah lets put random peoples names in a pastebin and claim they are 3 different groups all rolled into one. I just write articles, and sometimes people get upset by them. its probably Barr because i wrote those crowdleaks articles about him ,he also had his pet lawyer threaten me.
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#78What Interests me is, who capped all the logs. In a room with four ops and 4 non ops, unless it was server admin?
What about snagging someone's log files?
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#79How is this (if we presume it's true) possible without deep infiltration? If that's the case, wouldn't the guy that exposed them be a perpetrator too?
Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd
#80I find it amusing that they call Lulzsec out for being childish, then think it's relevant to post the personal information of some dude's sister (and cry "LESBOZ!!!" because she's married to another girl).
Reddit has rules against posting personal information. Does this website not? I really have little interest in websites that think it's ok to spread people's personal data. Weren't we mad at Sony and Lulzsec for allowing that sort of thing to happen?