Earlier quoted context omitted.
The iPhone SE is physically the same shape and size as the 4 but with much better internals. To me, that is "peak iPhone". I still use an SE to control a few things around the house. Without a SIM, with the mobile radios and bluetooth disabled but wifi enabled, and with Apple's idiotic News app that nobody wants disabled, the battery lasts for 20 days. Peak iPhone.
Isn’t the 2016 SE still useful as a phone?
iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
391–400 of 459 posts
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#392Not mentioned in the press release but this update also brings a new version of Safari (and WebView). Anyone knows if Safari in 14.5 is equivalent to a specific Technology Preview release? https://developer.apple.com/safari/technology-preview/releas...
it would be cool if Safari finally got WebGL 2 enabled by default
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#393Everyone is missing the point. This is the start of a major battle between two tech juggernauts. One look at the Facebook ads manager will show you Facebook is very scared about this privacy update and trying to do everything in their power to mitigate it. Apple is the gatekeeper and Facebook can't do anything about it. Their dominant revenue stream is about to be strangled. I think Zuckerberg realizes he is screwed…
Good chance FB will own the VR space from platform on a hardware and software level. My bet is they will be bigger in 10 years than they are now if VR materialises
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#394Earlier quoted context omitted.
> b) while wearing a mask Wtf? What possible benefit does this have? Securing your phone against people who stole it (and your watch) but aren't willing to put on a mask?
I wonder if Face ID is still able to partially detect a masked user's face, just with a much lower confidence interval. Maybe the presence of the watch allows Face ID to lower the confidence threshold when it detects a mask blocking half of the face. This is just a guess, I have no idea how Face ID works. If Face ID can't detect anything when a user wears a mask then I completely agree with you. It seems really silly…
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if Face ID is still able to partially detect a masked user's face, just with a much lower confidence interval. Maybe the presence of the watch allows Face ID to lower the confidence threshold when it detects a mask blocking half of the face. This is just a guess, I have no idea how Face ID works. If Face ID can't detect anything when a user wears a mask then I completely agree with you. It seems really silly…
It works because you put your watch on, unlock your watch. Your watch remains unlocked until you take it off. I was under the impression if you’re wearing your watch and it’s unlocked, and then you pick up your iPhone, it acts as the key to your phone.
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#396Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still sounds weird to me. I use an Android phone, I can unlock my phone at anytime using either face, fingerprint, or passcode. What exactly is the reason/rationale that it has to fail on facial recognition first before proceeding to use passcode?
Androids also have the option where you tell them not to lock if you're in your home (or other named places). Does iPhone support that?
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#397In regard to unlock w/Apple Watch: - This is an issue of Apple's own artificial creation. - This doesn't even solve the issue. So this all started because Face Unlock didn't work with masks, that's not Apple's fault. But what is entirely Apple's fault is that they break an option which resolves this only when Face Unlock is enabled: "Require Passcode." When you disable Face Unlock you can set Require Passcode to e.g.…
When you refer to the Apple Watch being “less aggressive to re-lock,” you’re really overselling it. The Watch does not re-lock for the entire time it’s on your wrist after you first unlock it (which you can do with FaceID on your phone). I go weeks without typing a passcode on my Watch.
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#398In regard to unlock w/Apple Watch: - This is an issue of Apple's own artificial creation. - This doesn't even solve the issue. So this all started because Face Unlock didn't work with masks, that's not Apple's fault. But what is entirely Apple's fault is that they break an option which resolves this only when Face Unlock is enabled: "Require Passcode." When you disable Face Unlock you can set Require Passcode to e.g.…
My face unlock works fine with sunglasses. If it detects a mask could it fall back to judging the remainder more thoroughly?
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#399Touch ID is an entirely superior technology and Apple is profoundly stupid for removing it. It doesn't have to be in the screen, just put it on the back. The lengths they'll go to offset the removal of Touch ID are astounding, from IR face tracking, to degraded biometric security, and now to requiring an Apple Watch to unlock the phone with your mask on. Talk about a Rube Goldberg machine.
Re: iOS 14.5 delivers Unlock iPhone with Apple Watch, new privacy controls, and more
#400Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still sounds weird to me. I use an Android phone, I can unlock my phone at anytime using either face, fingerprint, or passcode. What exactly is the reason/rationale that it has to fail on facial recognition first before proceeding to use passcode?
I am guessing the rationale is that Face ID is supposed to be so good that you won't need to use your passcode. In regular use, Face ID unlocks my phone the moment I lift it; showing an "enter passcode" option button would be redundant because it's already unlocked. Obviously this falls apart with masks.