Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's literally what's written in the article.
As you say, that line is at about the midpoint of the article. Your phrasing leaves it a little up in the air as to whether that is what the article is about, which I don’t think it is. “That is literally what’s written in the article” is quite a different statement from, “That’s literally mentioned in the article.” Yes, that’s mentioned in the article. Fine.
From what I understood you hijacked the thread into something like "don't be gullible, nothing runs forever, they're lying" which misrepresented the point of the Lichess article which is that they won't charge ever.
Imagine sb reacting to an announcement that healthcare will be free with "Nobody lives for ever, don't be stupid, they're lying"
Hijacking threads towards your personal point of interest is fine I guess and is part of why HN is interesting to me but then it should be clear you are talking about your own thing and you should not artificially place it in the context of the post under discussion (especially if it turns out you have not read it through).