So, the ascent of U.S. universities to high status on a worldwide scale, happened in the first half of the 20th century really. Why? Well, because Europe was tearing itself apart in two world wars, and the U.S. sat out the first half of both of those, while receiving a lot of talent fleeing those wars. If you have the money, and the former top-of-the-heap has bombed their wealth into rubble, it doesn't require any ma…
Why the United States has the best research universities
231–240 of 262 posts
Re: Why the United States has the best research universities
#232You guys have it really bad in terms of workload, length and insane costs.
Re: Why the United States has the best research universities
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
But not a temperate climate over its whole geography or stable government structures over the last 200 years.
The USSR was stable for 70 years. Long enough. The problem was lack of free markets. Free markets are the common thread among successful economic powers. Not population, not resources, not rivers, etc.
Though yeah, free markets are key.
Re: Why the United States has the best research universities
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
Although the Soviets had a very similar system (Operation Osoaviakhim) to get German scientists after the war, although less well known (and also a bit less voluntary on the part of the scientists) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Osoaviakhim
The Soviet's didn't really know how to properly make use of "their" Germans though, at least for working on concrete projects. Only very few designs of German teams actually made it into production (like the turboprop engines used in the Tu-95: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-95 ), but the Soviets never trusted their Germans enough to really integrate them longterm with Russian teams, instead the goal was to…
In the US the germans could build the rocket program by their own without much US interference, until Lyndon Johnson broke it up.
Re: Why the United States has the best research universities
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think like usual reality is more complex. The reason why America became such a economic powerhouse by the beginning of the 20th century was clearly the large scale immigration to a land that was generally considered the land of opportunities, without the crust of established economic structures in Europe. Someone from any social background could make it there. Due to this background there was a lot of aversion to "…
> It's somewhat ironic that the US which was founded on escaping the large "unfair" inequalities of old Europe and a strong anti-establishment/anti-elite basis has since become a beacon of a new elite/establishment and inequality. It's probably one of those cyclical things in life. Your former greatness ends up becoming a burden that keeps growing. Eventually it'll become so heavy that things fall apart. From the ash…
Re: Why the United States has the best research universities
#236But does it matter if you have an extreme wealth gap, a culture of fear and violence, and a lot of people living in poverty? It's always nice to point out the things that are doing great according to some metrics, but when put in perspective, what does it end up doing for the people? It shouldn't mean that "unless it benefits blue collar workers it doesn't need to exist", but you'd expect tooting one's own national h…
Many cultures value sharing the pizza equally. American culture values making more, and bigger pizzas.
Re: Why the United States has the best research universities
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone from the EU, some of your points seem very true, but it's also simply a matter of many people not really having the same goals and requirements. There is no true independence in any society, apart from autocracy, and externalities always exist. There doesn't seem to be much value attributed to 'having a lot of money' etc, for a lot of people, having a fulfilling job, family and life is enough, and having t…
Your explanation fits into what he described, point 3 & 4. You're trying to justify why taking risks isn't required.
There is no value in risk in itself.
Re: Why the United States has the best research universities
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
But not a temperate climate over its whole geography or stable government structures over the last 200 years.
The USSR was stable for 70 years. Long enough. The problem was lack of free markets. Free markets are the common thread among successful economic powers. Not population, not resources, not rivers, etc.
Re: Why the United States has the best research universities
#239So, the ascent of U.S. universities to high status on a worldwide scale, happened in the first half of the 20th century really. Why? Well, because Europe was tearing itself apart in two world wars, and the U.S. sat out the first half of both of those, while receiving a lot of talent fleeing those wars. If you have the money, and the former top-of-the-heap has bombed their wealth into rubble, it doesn't require any ma…