31–40 of 69 posts
how can any american or israeli support saying "stuxnet" in a normal way of conversation when it is a weapon used against another country with disastrous effects all the while latching on to "wiping israel off the map" which is something i'm told the guy didn't say.
"Few nations like the idea of Iran enhancing its nuclear capabilities" Lol. No nation in over a decade likes this idea except for maybe North Korea. Sure Israel has always been the most vocal, but Iran having the bomb is an international liability. Even the Sunni Arabs stripes have changed. Common enemies make strange bedfellows. Also, the Iranians have been willing to flex against their neighbors more recently. See…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't secret at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natanz#Nuclear_facility
Stupid question, but why isn’t it bombed (or all trucks coming/leaving targeted)? As far as I know, it is “illegal” (whatever the international equivalent is) to attempt to acquire the nuclear bomb. Which triggers the question, how did France obtain leniency from international powers when it gave the nuclear bomb to Israel in the 1960ies? Who decides what is legal? And who decides that Iran’s facility is not “slated…
Anyway Iran with the bomb is a good thing if you don't want another war in the middle-east.
"Few nations like the idea of Iran enhancing its nuclear capabilities" Lol. No nation in over a decade likes this idea except for maybe North Korea. Sure Israel has always been the most vocal, but Iran having the bomb is an international liability. Even the Sunni Arabs stripes have changed. Common enemies make strange bedfellows. Also, the Iranians have been willing to flex against their neighbors more recently. See…
Why shouldn't Iran have access to nuclear power, or nuclear weapons for that matter?
The Israelis have pretty much come out and said that they were responsible. They’re trying to sabatoge talks because Israel would collapse if it didn’t have an external enemy.
why there are fights 24/7?
"Few nations like the idea of Iran enhancing its nuclear capabilities" Lol. No nation in over a decade likes this idea except for maybe North Korea. Sure Israel has always been the most vocal, but Iran having the bomb is an international liability. Even the Sunni Arabs stripes have changed. Common enemies make strange bedfellows. Also, the Iranians have been willing to flex against their neighbors more recently. See…
Why shouldn't Iran have access to nuclear power, or nuclear weapons for that matter?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why shouldn't Iran have access to nuclear power, or nuclear weapons for that matter?
Its actually quite weird. Israel, France, the UK, and the USA all saying Iran cannot have nuclear weapons while all having nuclear weapons themselves (and the USA having used it on two civilian populations).
Only one nation has ever demonstrated and itchy trigger finger when it comes to these weapons.
Maybe you could make a case that having these weapons would make them more hostile/expansionist/aggressive. It certainly has merit considering what the US has been up to since 1945.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why shouldn't Iran have access to nuclear power, or nuclear weapons for that matter?
Its actually quite weird. Israel, France, the UK, and the USA all saying Iran cannot have nuclear weapons while all having nuclear weapons themselves (and the USA having used it on two civilian populations).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferatio...