https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-...
https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-buys-4-homes...
61–70 of 173 posts
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-...
https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-buys-4-homes...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, it is likely that he was just checking up on the competition. I wouldn't be surprised if turned the narrative on this by saying something like the following: "I was curious to check it out.. it wasn't very good, so I reverted back to Messenger/Whatsapp." IIRC, he made similar comments when he was spotted using G+. Disclaimer: My views are my own (and not necessarily shared by my employers).
It doesn't seem like you are aware that WhatsApp hired Moxie Marlinspike, the creator of the Signal encryption protocol, to re-implement it for WhatsApp. AFAIK it is still used in WhatsApp today. I will take this moment also to mention that "re-implement" isn't exactly right in that they modified the protocol slightly to allow for someone in control of the administration server to change a user's private key without…
You mean, no-longer-E2EE.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, it is likely that he was just checking up on the competition. I wouldn't be surprised if turned the narrative on this by saying something like the following: "I was curious to check it out.. it wasn't very good, so I reverted back to Messenger/Whatsapp." IIRC, he made similar comments when he was spotted using G+. Disclaimer: My views are my own (and not necessarily shared by my employers).
> Disclaimer: My views are my own (and not necessarily shared by my employers). Who is your employer? It's not mentioned in your profile...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m not totally convinced by the narrative that Mark doesn’t trust his own tools so he prefers Signal. He has tape over the camera of his own computer in Facebook HQ
Everybody should have a shutter over the camera, just to protect from blunders and misclicks. No matter how you trust your software, some malware may want to activate it, especially at a high-value target like Zuckerberg (or Bezos, or Nadella, etc). Alas, microphones are not as easy to deactivate.
If someone can access my camera and spy my unkept beard, why won't they also be able to access my keyboard and spy my main email account password?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually, they are. Just grab headphones with microphone and use scissors and keep the jack in.
Don't know about laptops but on recent desktop motherboards the jack detection and output/input switching is done in software. Probably the case on many laptops too. So this approach shouldn't be considered a "hardware switch" as it's still possible to capture audio from another mic even when a headset is plugged in.
I would have thought that Mark of all people would have complete faith in the privacy of Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. Very curious indeed.
I would imagine Mark of all people to at least do some amount of competitive analysis. It's like being surprised Elon test drove a BMW i3.
Isn’t a bit of a privacy flaw that signal exposes who uses the app by phone number?
That is aside of the obvious problem of phone numbers being recycled for re-issue after having been abandoned for a stretch of time.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And what was the suggestion? The flow of information is (You typing → IME converts key presses into text → Signal receives text) so Signal can't do anything to prevent a malicious IME from sending the text elsewhere. The best they could do is raise users' awareness that Signal won't protect them if there's spyware with privileged access on their device, and that their IME might be such spyware.
Mainly the OS has security options to prevent IME network connections that aren't always on by default, but users can enable them. (They might be off because it disables some features that need internet access.) IIRC there was also some Android API that could be used in the app to help, but I don't remember what it actually did atm.
Worse still, even if you block IME internet access on a device with a factory-maliciois IME, they could just upload the data using some other service on the device.
Installing a known-good IME seems like the only fix I can think of?
How dare you suggest Mark Zuckerberg is a hypocrite after said "Privacy is no longer a social norm", and then bought all houses surrounding his one. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-... https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-buys-4-homes...
people don't care about privacy but it's not exactly his fault. then his job is to capitalize on it. why would he care. you would probably do the same ..